Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses.


Journal

European journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 1460-2210
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909010

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 24 11 2019
medline: 30 9 2020
entrez: 24 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of orthodontic aligners to treat a variety of malocclusions has seen considerable increase in the last years, yet evidence about their efficacy and adverse effects relative to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances remains unclear. This systematic review assesses the efficacy of aligners and fixed appliances for comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Eight databases were searched without limitations in April 2019. Randomized or matched non-randomized studies. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was done independently in triplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) or relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted, followed by sensitivity analyses, and the GRADE analysis of the evidence quality. A total of 11 studies (4 randomized/7 non-randomized) were included comparing aligners with braces (887 patients; mean age 28.0 years; 33% male). Moderate quality evidence indicated that treatment with orthodontic aligners is associated with worse occlusal outcome with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (3 studies; MD = 9.9; 95% CI = 3.6-16.2) and more patients with unacceptable results (3 studies; RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0). No significant differences were seen for treatment duration. The main limitations of existing evidence pertained to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of included studies. Orthodontic treatment with aligners is associated with worse treatment outcome compared to fixed appliances in adult patients. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of aligners as a treatment modality that is equally effective to the gold standard of braces. PROSPERO (CRD42019131589).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The use of orthodontic aligners to treat a variety of malocclusions has seen considerable increase in the last years, yet evidence about their efficacy and adverse effects relative to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review assesses the efficacy of aligners and fixed appliances for comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
SEARCH METHODS
Eight databases were searched without limitations in April 2019.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized or matched non-randomized studies.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was done independently in triplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) or relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted, followed by sensitivity analyses, and the GRADE analysis of the evidence quality.
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies (4 randomized/7 non-randomized) were included comparing aligners with braces (887 patients; mean age 28.0 years; 33% male). Moderate quality evidence indicated that treatment with orthodontic aligners is associated with worse occlusal outcome with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (3 studies; MD = 9.9; 95% CI = 3.6-16.2) and more patients with unacceptable results (3 studies; RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0). No significant differences were seen for treatment duration. The main limitations of existing evidence pertained to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of included studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Orthodontic treatment with aligners is associated with worse treatment outcome compared to fixed appliances in adult patients. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of aligners as a treatment modality that is equally effective to the gold standard of braces.
REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42019131589).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31758191
pii: 5638136
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz094
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

331-343

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Spyridon N Papageorgiou (SN)

Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Despina Koletsi (D)

Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Anna Iliadi (A)

Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Timo Peltomaki (T)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Department of Ear and Oral Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Theodore Eliades (T)

Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH