Success rate 1 year after apical surgery: a retrospective analysis.
Apical surgery
Apicoectomy
Retrograde filling
Success rate
Journal
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
ISSN: 1865-1569
Titre abrégé: Oral Maxillofac Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101319632
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
10
06
2019
accepted:
04
11
2019
pubmed:
24
11
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
entrez:
24
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the current study was the retrospective analysis of the outcomes of teeth treated with apical surgery after a 1-year follow-up period. Furthermore, potential factors associated with the success rate were investigated. All patients were treated at the Clinic of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery at the University of Zurich between 2010 and 2017. To be eligible for inclusion, all patients were required to have undergone apical surgery with a retrograde root-end filling, and a 1-year follow-up examination at the University of Zurich. Treatment success at the 1-year follow-up time-point was defined as an absence of clinical complaints and radiographically determined healing. Parameters that were analysed included tooth localisation, periapical index of the preoperative lesion, administration of antibiotics, smoker status, histopathology of the apical lesion, radiographically determined sufficiency of root canal treatment pain and clinical signs of inflammation at the initial examination. A total of 81 teeth fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. At the 1-year follow-up, 91.4% of the teeth exhibited successful clinical and radiographic healing. The type of tooth was significantly associated with the success of the surgery (p = 0.006), but radiological severity of periapical inflammation, lesion histopathology, administration of antibiotics, smoker status, the quality of the root canal treatment, and preoperative pain and clinical signs of inflammation were not. The results of the present study suggest that apical surgery with retrograde root-end filling is a reliable therapy for the preservation of teeth. Furthermore, there are limited factors that affect the treatment outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31758280
doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00815-9
pii: 10.1007/s10006-019-00815-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
45-49Références
Int Endod J. 2000 Mar;33(2):91-8
pubmed: 11307456
J Endod. 2006 Jul;32(7):601-23
pubmed: 16793466
J Endod. 2017 Mar;43(3):496-501
pubmed: 28139285
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 May;87(5):617-27
pubmed: 10348524
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1505-11
pubmed: 19840638
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Jan;81(1):93-102
pubmed: 8850492
J Endod. 2019 Apr;45(4):394-401
pubmed: 30827766
J Endod. 2012 Jan;38(1):1-10
pubmed: 22152611
J Endod. 2010 Nov;36(11):1757-65
pubmed: 20951283
J Endod. 2010 Jun;36(6):957-73
pubmed: 20478447
J Endod. 2012 May;38(5):570-9
pubmed: 22515881
Int Endod J. 1993 Jul;26(4):225-33
pubmed: 8225641
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986 Feb;2(1):20-34
pubmed: 3457698
Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1(4):215-28
pubmed: 4199169
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2001;111(5):579-90
pubmed: 11449564
Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1(4):195-214
pubmed: 4199168
J Endod. 2007 Feb;33(2):123-8
pubmed: 17258628