Venom Immunotherapy: Questions and Controversies.
Anaphylaxis
Epinephrine
Insect sting
Venom allergy
Venom immunotherapy
Journal
Immunology and allergy clinics of North America
ISSN: 1557-8607
Titre abrégé: Immunol Allergy Clin North Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8805635
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
entrez:
26
11
2019
pubmed:
26
11
2019
medline:
2
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Questions and controversies regarding venom immunotherapy (VIT) remain. It is important to recognize risk factors for severe sting anaphylaxis that guide the recommendation for testing, epinephrine injectors, and VIT. Premedication, rush VIT, and omalizumab are successful in overcoming recurrent systemic reactions to VIT. A maintenance dose is adequate in children, but higher doses are needed in high-risk patients. The consensus on risk of β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients on VIT has shifted to the belief that risk is small. The decision to stop VIT after 5 years rests on known risk factors rather than any diagnostic tests.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31761121
pii: S0889-8561(19)30064-5
doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2019.09.002
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Venoms
0
Omalizumab
2P471X1Z11
Epinephrine
YKH834O4BH
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
59-68Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.