Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice - 2019 Update.
Attitudes
Global
Myopia control
Myopia management
Myopia progression
Orthokeratology
Journal
Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association
ISSN: 1476-5411
Titre abrégé: Cont Lens Anterior Eye
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9712714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
08
08
2019
accepted:
01
11
2019
pubmed:
26
11
2019
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
26
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A survey in 2015 identified a high level of eye care practitioner concern about myopia with a reported moderately high level of activity, but the vast majority still prescribed single vision interventions to young myopes. This research aimed to update these findings 4 years later. A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in eight languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy of available strategies and adoption levels of such strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies. Of the 1336 respondents, concern was highest (9.0 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) in Asia and lowest (7.6 ± 2.2; p < 0.001) in Australasia. Practitioners from Asia also considered their clinical practice of myopia control to be the most active (7.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.001), the North American practitioners being the least active (6.3 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by pharmaceutical approaches and approved myopia control soft contact lenses (p < 0.001). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall, most practitioners did not consider single-vision distance under-correction to be an effective strategy for attenuating myopia progression (79.6 %), but prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients (63.6 ± 21.8 %). The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (20.6 %) and inadequate information (17.6 %). While practitioner concern about myopia and the reported level of activity have increased over the last 4 years, the vast majority of eye care clinicians still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. With recent global consensus evidence-based guidelines having been published, it is hoped that this will inform the practice of myopia management in future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31761738
pii: S1367-0484(19)30258-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.002
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9-17Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.