Neurophysiological and neuroradiological test for early poor outcome (Cerebral Performance Categories 3-5) prediction after cardiac arrest: Prospective multicentre prognostication data.
Anoxia-ischemia
Brain
Cardiac arrest
Coma
Computed tomography
Electroencephalogram
Prognosis
Somatosensory evoked potentials
Journal
Data in brief
ISSN: 2352-3409
Titre abrégé: Data Brief
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101654995
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
28
08
2019
revised:
24
10
2019
accepted:
28
10
2019
entrez:
26
11
2019
pubmed:
26
11
2019
medline:
26
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The data presented here are related to our research article entitled "Neurophysiology and neuroimaging accurately predict poor neurological outcome within 24 hours after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre prognostication study (ProNeCA)" [1]. We report a secondary analysis on the ability of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), brain computed tomography (CT) and electroencephalography (EEG) to predict poor neurological outcome at 6 months in 346 patients who were comatose after cardiac arrest. Differently from the related research article, here we included cerebral performance category (CPC) 3 among poor outcomes, so that the outcomes are dichotomised as CPC 1-2 (absent to mild neurological disability: good outcome) vs. CPC 3-5 (severe neurological disability, persistent vegetative state, or death: poor outcome). The accuracy of the index tests was recalculated accordingly. A bilaterally absent/absent-pathological amplitude (AA/AP) N20 SEPs wave, a Grey Matter/White Matter (GM/WM) ratio <1.21 on brain CT and an isoelectric or burst suppression EEG predicted poor outcome with 49.6%, 42.2% and 29.8% sensitivity, respectively, and 100% specificity. The distribution of positive results of the three predictors did not overlap completely in the population of patients with poor outcome, so that when combining them the overall sensitivity raised to 61.2%.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31763408
doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104755
pii: S2352-3409(19)31110-2
pii: 104755
pmc: PMC6864134
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
104755Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors.
Références
Resuscitation. 2018 Jun;127:147-163
pubmed: 29706235
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;30(1):1-27
pubmed: 23377439
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Jun;135(6):641-648
pubmed: 27480262
Acta Neurol Scand. 2019 Feb;139(2):158-165
pubmed: 30230524
Neurophysiol Clin. 2017 Sep;47(4):327-335
pubmed: 28780193
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jul;127(7):2610-7
pubmed: 27291880
Crit Care. 2018 Jun 5;22(1):150
pubmed: 29871657
Resuscitation. 2018 Aug;129:114-120
pubmed: 29679698
Clin Neuroradiol. 2015 Mar;25(1):49-54
pubmed: 24626778
Resuscitation. 2019 Oct;143:115-123
pubmed: 31400398
Circulation. 2019 Aug 27;140(9):e517-e542
pubmed: 31291775
Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:A4-5
pubmed: 25737079
Data Brief. 2018 May 25;19:704-711
pubmed: 29904713