Everolimus Exposure as a Predictor of Toxicity in Renal Cell Cancer Patients in the Adjuvant Setting: Results of a Pharmacokinetic Analysis for SWOG S0931 (EVEREST), a Phase III Study (NCT01120249).

Renal cell carcinoma adjuvant chemotherapy everolimus pharmacokinetics therapeutic drug monitoring

Journal

Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)
ISSN: 2468-4570
Titre abrégé: Kidney Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101735372

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Aug 2019
Historique:
entrez: 26 11 2019
pubmed: 26 11 2019
medline: 26 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

S0931 is assessing recurrence-free survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients randomized to receive everolimus (EVE) versus placebo for one year following nephrectomy. Due to a higher than expected dropout rate, we assessed EVE trough levels in the adjuvant setting to evaluate the relationship between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity. Patients received 10 mg daily EVE for nine 6-week cycles. Pre-dose whole blood samples were collected pre-cycle 2 and pre-cycle 3 and analyzed for EVE. Patients with pre-cycle 2 and/or pre-cycle 3 EVE results were used in the analysis. Patients were segregated into quartiles (Q) based on EVE levels and logistic regression was used to model the most common adverse event outcomes using EVE trough as a predictor. Hazard and odds ratios were adjusted for age, BMI and performance status. A total of 467 patients were included in this analysis. Quartiles normalized to an EVE dose of 10 mg/day were < 9.0, 9.0-12.9, 12.9-22.8, and > 22.8 ng/mL, respectively. EVE trough levels increased with increasing age ( We identified significant gender and age-related differences in EVE trough levels in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for RCC. Furthermore, our analysis identified significant associations between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
S0931 is assessing recurrence-free survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients randomized to receive everolimus (EVE) versus placebo for one year following nephrectomy. Due to a higher than expected dropout rate, we assessed EVE trough levels in the adjuvant setting to evaluate the relationship between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity.
METHODS METHODS
Patients received 10 mg daily EVE for nine 6-week cycles. Pre-dose whole blood samples were collected pre-cycle 2 and pre-cycle 3 and analyzed for EVE. Patients with pre-cycle 2 and/or pre-cycle 3 EVE results were used in the analysis. Patients were segregated into quartiles (Q) based on EVE levels and logistic regression was used to model the most common adverse event outcomes using EVE trough as a predictor. Hazard and odds ratios were adjusted for age, BMI and performance status.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 467 patients were included in this analysis. Quartiles normalized to an EVE dose of 10 mg/day were < 9.0, 9.0-12.9, 12.9-22.8, and > 22.8 ng/mL, respectively. EVE trough levels increased with increasing age (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We identified significant gender and age-related differences in EVE trough levels in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for RCC. Furthermore, our analysis identified significant associations between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31763512
doi: 10.3233/KCA-180049
pii: KCA180049
pmc: PMC6864417
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

111-118

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233160
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002384
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233340
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA033572
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180888
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180819
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2019 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

TWS reports a grant from The Hope Foundation through the SWOG Trial Support (STrS) program, during the conduct of this study. EIH reports clinical trial funding support from Genentech/Roche, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. PCM reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Guardant Health, and personal fees from Apton Biosystems, all outside the submitted work. MNS reports grants and personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, grants from Janssen Oncology, grants from Advaxis, grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and grants from Nektar, all outside the submitted work. PL reports consultant fees from Novartis, during the conduct of this study. NJV reports personal fees from Novartis, during the conduct of this study; personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Exelixis, personal fees from BMS, all outside the submitted work. CWR reports non-financial support from Novartis, during the conduct of this study; personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Exelixis, personal fees from Genentech/Roche, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Argos, grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants from CytRx Corporation, grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, grants from Eisai, grants from Exelixis, grants from Genentech, grants from Novartis, grants from Glaxo Smith Kline, grants from Janssen, grants from Karyopharm, grants from MabVax, grants from Merck, grants from Morophotek, grants from Threshold Pharmaceuticals, grants from TRACON, and non-financial support from Bayer, all outside the submitted work. MP, CMT, GSP, MVM, and IMT have nothing to disclose.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2246-2254
pubmed: 27718781
Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):519-25
pubmed: 26759276
Ther Drug Monit. 2004 Oct;26(5):499-505
pubmed: 15385832
Anticancer Drugs. 2010 Jun;21(5):478-86
pubmed: 20401967
Ther Drug Monit. 2016 Dec;38(6):663-669
pubmed: 27661398
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3916-3923
pubmed: 28902533
Pharmacol Res. 2017 Jul;121:138-144
pubmed: 28473246
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Nov;72(5):1089-96
pubmed: 24057042
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Jan;69(1):48-56
pubmed: 11180038
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 May;73(5):999-1007
pubmed: 24682543
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Feb;50(3):486-95
pubmed: 24332451
Lancet. 2008 Aug 9;372(9637):449-56
pubmed: 18653228
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2008-16
pubmed: 26969090
Ther Drug Monit. 2005 Oct;27(5):666-76
pubmed: 16175142
Transplantation. 2002 Mar 27;73(6):920-5
pubmed: 11923693

Auteurs

Timothy W Synold (TW)

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.

Melissa Plets (M)

SWOG Statistical Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Catherine M Tangen (CM)

SWOG Statistical Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Elisabeth I Heath (EI)

Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

Ganesh S Palapattu (GS)

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Philip C Mack (PC)

UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Mark N Stein (MN)

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Maxwell V Meng (MV)

University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, A, USA.

Primo Lara (P)

UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Nicholas J Vogelzang (NJ)

Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Ian Murchie Thompson (IM)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Christopher W Ryan (CW)

Oregon Health & Science University, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.

Classifications MeSH