Application of tpsDig2 Software in Nasal Angle Measurements.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
26
11
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
26
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Nose is considered to be a conspicuous feature of human face. Its different parameters like shape, size, nasal angles etc may indicate one's gender, age, race, adapted climatic conditions, and the environment to which one belongs to. Furthermore, it is an important component and determinant of an individual's physical outlook and appearance. The current study provides a new approach for the assistance of anthropologists and forensic experts in human identification and sex determination from the nasal angles. The study was performed on a total of 500 subjects (250 males and 250 females) belonging to north India (Mandi, Himachal Pradesh State). In comparison to the classical and manual methods for nasal angle measurements, an automated approach was followed in the present study. A Windows-based software called tpsDig2 was used for nasal angle measurements by utilization of the landmarks (nasion, pronasale, subnasale, and alare). Three nasal angles (nasal prominence angle, inter-alar angle, and nasal tip angle) were measured in all the subjects and each measurement was repeated thrice to reduce the measurement error and increase the specificity and efficiency of the results. Discriminant function statistics was used for determination of sex from different nasal angles. The results of the statistical analysis (ANOVA) performed using SPSS reveal the significant difference between males and females in all the 3 repeated measurements of nasal angles. The final discriminant classification statistics show that 64% of original grouped cases have been correctly classified and the designed statistical model can be used in several forensic scenarios for the sex determination on the basis of the available nasal angles. The study may be further useful in the identification cases pertaining to facial reconstruction. The investigation may also be helpful in providing specific correlation of the nasal angles with the other parts of the face in the cases of remodelling and reformation of craniofacial alterations and reconstructions in plastic surgery and aesthetics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31764561
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006024
pii: 00001665-202001000-00082
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
319-325Références
Farkas LG, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Geography of the nose: a morphometric study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1986; 10:191–223.
Chaurasia BD. Garg K. Nose and paranasal sinuses. Human Anatomy, Head-Neck-Brain 6th edn.Delhi, India: CBS Publishers; 2017. 239–250.
Dhingra PL, Dhingra S. Anatomy of nose. In: Diseases of Ear, Nose and Throat, 7th edn. Delhi, India: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017:149–55
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, et al. Three-dimensional study of growth and development of the nose. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34:309–317.
Last RJ, McMinn RMH. Last's anatomy, regional and applied. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
Posen JM. A longitudinal study of the growth of the nose. Am J Orthod 1967; 53:746–756.
Fox S. Noses beat eyes as a biometric identification marker. Popular Science. 2010. Available at: https://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-03/noses-beat-eyes-biometric-identification-landmark. Accessed May 21, 2019
Tobin L. Research noses ahead. The Guardian. 2010. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/apr/06/biometric-research-face-recognition. Accessed May 24, 2019
Mishima K, Mori Y, Yamada T, et al. Anthropometric analysis of the nose in the Japanese. Cells Tissues Organs 2002; 170:198–206.
Hwang TS, Song J, Yoon H, et al. Morphometry of the nasal bones and piriform apertures in Koreans. Ann Anat 2005; 187:411–414.
Anibor E, Etetafia MO, Eboh DE, et al. Anthropometric study of the nasal parameters of the Isokos in Delta State of Nigeria. Ann Biol Res 2011; 2:408–413.
Uzun A, Ozdemir F. Morphometric analysis of nasal shapes and angles in young adults. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 80:397–402.
Jovanovic J, Jeremic D, Jovanovic B, et al. Nasal morphological characteristics of the Serbian population. Arch Biol Sci Belgrade 2014; 66:227–234.
Rynn C, Wilkinson CM. Appraisal of traditional and recently proposed relationships between the hard and soft dimensions of the nose in profile. Am J Phys Anthropol 2006; 130:364–373.
Lee KM, Lee WJ, Cho JH, et al. Three-dimensional prediction of the nose for facial reconstruction using cone-beam computed tomography. Forensic Sci Int 2014; 23: 194-e1.
Tedeschi-Oliveira SV, Beaini TL, Melani RFH. Forensic facial reconstruction: nasal projection in Brazilian adults. Forensic Sci Int 2016; 266:123–129.
Miranda GE, Wilkinson C, Roughley M, et al. Assessment of accuracy and recognition of three-dimensional computerized forensic craniofacial reconstruction. PloS One 2018; 13:e0196770.
Khandekar B, Srinivasan S, Mokal N, et al. Anthropometric analysis of lip-nose complex in Indian population. Indian J Plast Surg 2005; 38:128.
Chhabra N, Bedi M, Patnaik VG. Anthropometric study of the nose of 600 north Indian adults (a study done for forensic identification). Natl J Integr Res Med 2012; 3:62–68.
Gautam RK, Adak DK, Pal M, et al. Morphometric variation among the Central Indian population. Hum Bio Rev 2013; 2:153–175.
Patil GV, Shishirkumar AD. Study on nasal index in south Indian population. Int J Curr Res 2014; 6:8163–8164.
Ray SK, Saha K, Kumar A, et al. Anthropometric study of nasal index among the population of Western Uttar Pradesh Region. Int J Sci Res 2016; 4:65–70.
Patil SB, Kale SM, Jaiswal S, et al. The average Indian female nose. Aesth Plast Surg 2011; 35:1036–1042.
Mehta N, Srivastava RK. The Indian nose: an anthropometric analysis. Br J Plast Surg 2012; 70:1472–1482.
Loveday OE, Hakeem FB, Lekara DT. A software tool for facial analysis. Res J Appl Sci Eng Tech 2012; 15:551–556.
Sforza C, Ferrario VF. Soft-tissue facial anthropometry in three dimensions: from anatomical landmarks to digital morphology in research, clinics and forensic anthropology. J Anthropol Sci 2006; 84:97–124.
Ozkul T, Ozkul MH, Akhtar R, et al. A software tool for measurement of facial parameters. Open Chem Biomed Methods J 2009; 2:69–74.
Douglas TS. Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2004; 28:401–409.
Rohlf FJ. TPSDig2: a program for landmark development and analysis. SUNY Stony Brook. 2001. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph. Accessed Mar 19, 2019
Hall JG, Froster-Iskenius UG, Allanson JE. Handbook of Normal Physical Measurement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1989.
Djordjevic J, Zhurov AI, Richmond S, et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to facial morphological variation: a 3D population-based twin study. PloS One 2016; 11:e0162250.
Suhk J, Park J, Nguyen AH. Nasal analysis and anatomy: anthropometric proportional assessment in Asians—Aesthetic balance from forehead to chin. In: Sameep K (ed) Seminars in Plastic Surgery, Part 1. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2015;29:219–25
Gualdi-Russo E. Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with aging in an urban Italian population. HOMO 1998; 49:241–259.
Zankl A, Eberle L, Molinari L, et al. Growth charts for nose length, nasal protrusion, and philtrum length from birth to 97 years. Am J Med Genet 2002; 111:388–391.
Genecov JS, Sinclair PM, Dechow PC. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod 1990; 60:191–198.
He ZJ, Jian XC, Wu XS, et al. Anthropometric measurement and analysis of the external nasal soft tissue in 119 young Han Chinese adults. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20:1347–1351.
Etoz A, Ercan I. Anthropometric analysis of the nose, In: Handbook of Anthropometry. New York, NY: Springer; 2012:919–26
Oladipo G, Fawehinmi H, Suleiman Y. The study of nasal parameters (nasal height, nasal width, nasal index) amongst the Yorubas of Nigeria. Internet J Biol Anthropol 2009; 3:1–11.
Heidari Z, Khammar T, Khammar M. Anthropometric measurements of the external nose in 18–25-year-old Sistani and Baluch Aborigine women in the Southeast of Iran. Folia Morphol 2009; 68:88–92.
Li KZ, Guo S, Sun Q, et al. Anthropometric nasal analysis of Han Chinese young adults. J Cranio Maxill Surg 2014; 42:153–158.
Mehta N, Srivastava RK. The Indian nose: an anthropometric analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70:1472–1482.
Sforza C, Grandi G, De Menezes M, et al. Age and sex-related changes in the normal human external nose. Forensic Sci Int 2011; 204: 205.e1-205.e9.