Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerance of Subliminal Subthreshold Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation With a Duty Factor of 25% Versus 31.3% for Advanced Glaucoma.
Journal
Journal of glaucoma
ISSN: 1536-481X
Titre abrégé: J Glaucoma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9300903
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
26
11
2019
medline:
21
3
2020
entrez:
26
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
PRéCIS:: Subliminal subthreshold transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (SS-TSCPC) with duty cycles 25% and 31.3% seems to be an effective approach to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma that is refractory to medical management. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and the tolerance of SS-TSCPC with a duty cycle of 25% versus 31.3% with Supra 810 nm Subliminal Quantel Medical laser stimulation for advanced glaucoma. This was a retrospective, single-center, comparative case series of patients treated by SS-TSCPC between January 2017 and July 2017. The diagnostic and inclusion criteria were patients with advanced and refractory glaucoma, defined as IOP >21 mm Hg on maximal tolerated medical therapy with or without previous glaucoma surgical procedures, a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and patients who refused or were poor candidates for additional filtering surgery or implantation of glaucoma drainage devices. The primary endpoint was surgical success defined as an IOP of 6 to 21 mm Hg or a reduction of IOP by 20% from baseline without an increase in glaucoma medication from baseline. The secondary endpoints were the mean IOP and best visual corrected acuity best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months after surgery, retreatment outcomes, glaucoma medications, and complications such as inflammation, uveitis, cataract, mydriasis, and phthisis. Forty eyes of 32 patients were included: 20 eyes were subjected to SS-TSCPC with 31.3% duty cycle and 20 eyes with a 25% duty cycle. The surgical success of the TSCPC 12 months after the first procedure was better in the 31.3% duty cycle group (83.5%) than in the 25% duty cycle group (65%). The most common complications were inflammation (50%, 1 mo after surgery) and IOP spikes (increase in IOP of >25% from baseline within 1 mo of laser) in both groups. Inflammation was higher in the 31.3% duty cycle group. SS-TSCPC at 31.3% and 25% duty cycle seems to be an effective approach to reduce IOP in glaucoma that is refractory to medical management. SS-TSCPC at 31.3% duty cycle is more effective than the 25% duty cycle SS-TSCPC. However, the 31.3% duty cycle SS-TSCPC induces more inflammation than the 25% duty cycle SS-TSCPC. Each procedure should be considered on a case by case basis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31764578
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001409
pii: 00061198-202002000-00005
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
97-103Références
Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090.
Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1268–1279.
Crawley L, Zamir SM, Cordeiro MF, et al. Clinical options for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmol Eye Dis. 2012;4:43–64.
Lachkar Y, Neverauskiene J, Jeanteur-Lunel MN, et al. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy: a 6-year retrospective study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004;14:26–36.
Olmos LC, Lee RK. Medical and surgical treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2011;51:27–36.
Denis P, Aptel F, Rouland J-F, et al. Cyclocoagulation of the ciliary bodies by high-intensity focused ultrasound: a 12-month multicenter study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:1089–1096.
Weve H. Die zyklodiatermie das corpus ciliare bei glaukom [The diathermy of ciliary body in glaucoma]. Zentralbl Ophthalmol. 1933;29:562–569.
Dunphy EB, Albaugh CH. Cyclodiathermy: an operation for the treatment of glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1941;39:193–213.
Vernon SA, Koppens JM, Menon GJ, et al. Diode laser cycloablation in adult glaucoma: long-term results of a standard protocol and review of current literature. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34:411–420.
Jennings BJ, Mathews DE. Complications of neodymium: YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:686–691.
Weekers R, Lavergne G, Watillon M, et al. Effects of photocoagulation of ciliary body upon ocular tension. Am J Ophthalmol. 1961;52:156–163.
Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Driller J, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of glaucoma. II. Clinical applications. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:347–353.
Pratesi R. Diode lasers in photomedicine. IEEE J Quantum Elect. 1984;20:1433–1439.
Hennis HL, Stewart WC. Semiconductor diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:81–85.
Maus M, Katz LJ. Choroidal detachment, flat anterior chamber, and hypotony as complications of neodymium: YAG laser cyclophotocoagulation. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:69–72.
Ndulue JK, Rahmatnejad K, Sanvicente C, et al. Evolution of cyclophotocoagulation. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2018;13:55–61.
Aptel F, Denis P, Rouland JF, et al. Multicenter clinical trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in glaucoma patients without previous filtering surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94:e268–e277.
Graber M, Rothschild P-R, Khoueir Z, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound cyclodestruction versus cyclodiode treatment of refractory glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2018;41:611–618.
Tan AM, Chockalingam M, Aquino MC, et al. Micropulse transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38:266–272.
Emanuel ME, Grover DS, Fellman RL, et al. Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation: initial results in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:726–729.
Yelenskiy A, Gillette TB, Arosemena A, et al. Patient outcomes following micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: intermediate-term results. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:920–925.
Aquino MC, Barton K, Tan AM, et al. Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: a randomized exploratory study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;43:40–46.
Benhatchi N, Bensmail D, Lachkar Y. Benefits of SubCyclo laser therapy guided by high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy in patients with refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2019;28:535–539.
Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:509–516.
Williams AL, Moster MR, Rahmatnejad K, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety profile of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:445–449.
Zaarour K, Abdelmassih Y, Arej N, et al. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in uncontrolled glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2019;28:270–275.
Ishida K. Update on results and complications of cyclophotocoagulation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24:102–110.
Kuchar S, Moster MR, Reamer CB, et al. Treatment outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in advanced glaucoma. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31:393–396.