Accuracy of Bony Gutter Placement in Cervical Laminoplasty Assisted by 3-D Print Modeling, and Associations with Posterior Spinal Cord Shift and Radiculopathy.

Cervical laminoplasty radiculopathy surgical accuracy three-dimensional printed model

Journal

Spine surgery and related research
ISSN: 2432-261X
Titre abrégé: Spine Surg Relat Res
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101718059

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 08 03 2019
accepted: 06 05 2019
entrez: 27 11 2019
pubmed: 27 11 2019
medline: 27 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We evaluated the positioning of the bony gutter (PBG) in cervical laminoplasty aided by three-dimensional (3-D) printed models, and assessed associations between PBG accuracy¸ posterior shift of the spinal cord (PSSC), and clinical results. Of 35 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy between January 2013 and September 2015, 20 were treated using a conventional free-hand technique (Group A). For the other 15 patients (Group B), surgeons also used 3-D printed models to select a PBG on the edge of the medial aspect of the zygapophyseal joint to maximize the angle of the opened lamina (AOL). We measured the PBG and AOL on axial computed tomography images, and the PSSC on midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging obtained before and 7 days after surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and recovery rates, and by the incidence of postoperative radiculopathy. We compared the PBG, AOL, PSSC, and clinical outcomes between the groups. The PBG was significantly lower in Group B than in Group A at the C4 left and right sides (P = 0.033, P < 0.0001) and C6 left side (P = 0.004), and the AOL was larger at the C4 right side, C5 left and right sides, C6 left side, and C7 right side (P = 0.040, 0.043, 0.016, 0.016, and 0.027, respectively). Group B had a higher percentage of on-target PBGs at the right sides of C4 and C5 and the left side of C7 (P = 0.005, 0.037, and 0.028), a larger PSSC at C4 and C5 (P = 0.023, 0.008), and a higher incidence of radiculopathy (P = 0.026). Groups A and B did not differ significantly in JOA score or recovery rate. Three-dimensional modeling improved PBG accuracy. However, maximizing the spinal canal increased the PSSC and subsequent radiculopathy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31768446
doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2019-0014
pmc: PMC6834455
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

277-284

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no relevant conflicts of interest.

Références

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jan 1;23(1):32-7
pubmed: 9460149
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Oct 1;23(19):2057-62
pubmed: 9794049
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 23;8(1):11026
pubmed: 30038213
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 1;34(3):274-9
pubmed: 19179922
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 15;30(22):2544-9
pubmed: 16284593
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26):E1553-8
pubmed: 21116219
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jun;(411):129-39
pubmed: 12782868
Asian Spine J. 2016 Apr;10(2):298-308
pubmed: 27114771
J Surg Res. 2017 Aug;216:18-25
pubmed: 28807205
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Nov 1;28(21):2447-51
pubmed: 14595162
Asian Spine J. 2019 Mar 15;13(4):592-600
pubmed: 30866615
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 1;26(5):479-87
pubmed: 11242374
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 1;26(13):1443-7; discussion 1448
pubmed: 11458148
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Mar;17(3 Suppl):S41-3
pubmed: 1314432
Brain. 1972;95(1):87-100
pubmed: 5023093
Chin J Traumatol. 2014;17(5):261-6
pubmed: 25293895
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Oct;19(9):1763-71
pubmed: 9802503
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):706-12
pubmed: 19333104
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):740-744
pubmed: 27367939
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jan;80(1):19-24
pubmed: 9460946
Int J Dent. 2014;2014:164164
pubmed: 24899895
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Mar;92(3):393-400
pubmed: 20190311

Auteurs

Gentaro Kumagai (G)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Kanichiro Wada (K)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Hitoshi Kudo (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Toru Asari (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Yasuyuki Ishibashi (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Classifications MeSH