Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis are Beneficial Tools for Measuring the Trunk Muscle Mass of Patients with Low Back Pain.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
bioelectrical impedance analysis
low back pain
trunk muscles
Journal
Spine surgery and related research
ISSN: 2432-261X
Titre abrégé: Spine Surg Relat Res
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101718059
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
11
06
2018
accepted:
11
01
2019
entrez:
27
11
2019
pubmed:
27
11
2019
medline:
27
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Limb muscle mass measurement using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Moreover, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is also recognized as a beneficial tool considering its high correlation with DXA. However, it remains to be elucidated whether DXA and BIA can accurately measure trunk lean mass. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between DXA and BIA measurements of trunk muscle mass and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of trunk muscles measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare measures of trunk muscle mass obtained using DXA and BIA in patients with low back pain (LBP). In total, 65 patients participated in the study. The correlation between DXA and BIA measurements and the CSA of trunk and paraspinal muscles at the L4-5 level were calculated. In addition, the correlation between DXA and BIA measurements of trunk muscle mass and the differences between these two measurements were determined. The correlation coefficient between DXA and BIA trunk muscle mass measurement and trunk muscle CSA was 0.74 and 0.56 for men and 0.69 and 0.44 for women, respectively. DXA and BIA measurement values showed a significantly moderate correlation with the CSA of the erector spinae (ES) and psoas major (PM). The multifidus (MF) CSA did not correlate with measurements of DXA and BIA in both men and women. Although DXA and BIA measurements were significantly correlated, a significant difference between these two measurements was found. BIA overestimated the trunk muscle mass significantly compared with DXA. Trunk muscle mass measured with DXA and BIA was correlated with the CSA of most trunk muscles. Although the measurement of DXA and BIA showed a high correlation, BIA overestimated trunk muscle mass compared with DXA. Both DXA and BIA are beneficial for measuring trunk muscle mass.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31768453
doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0040
pmc: PMC6834466
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
335-341Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no relevant conflicts of interest.
Références
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Sep;110(1):57-65
pubmed: 20390291
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Mar 18;16:60
pubmed: 25887598
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Sep;56(9):1710-5
pubmed: 18691288
J Hum Kinet. 2015 Oct 14;47:73-80
pubmed: 26557191
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 15;147(8):755-63
pubmed: 9554417
Asian Spine J. 2018 Oct;12(5):839-845
pubmed: 30213166
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2006 Oct;188(2):77-89
pubmed: 16948795
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Aug 1;39(17):1417-25
pubmed: 24859576
J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Aug;22(4):646-51
pubmed: 17728503
Spine J. 2016 Apr;16(4):451-8
pubmed: 26165478
BMC Med. 2007 Jan 25;5:2
pubmed: 17254322
Nutrition. 2016 Nov-Dec;32(11-12):1200-5
pubmed: 27292773
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Dec;29(10):441-447
pubmed: 27879506