Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials.
integration
qualitative
quantitative
research methods
trials
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 11 2019
26 11 2019
Historique:
entrez:
28
11
2019
pubmed:
28
11
2019
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is common to undertake qualitative research alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs) when evaluating complex interventions. Researchers tend to analyse these datasets one by one and then consider their findings separately within the discussion section of the final report, rarely integrating quantitative and qualitative data or findings, and missing opportunities to combine data in order to add rigour, enabling thorough and more complete analysis, provide credibility to results, and generate further important insights about the intervention under evaluation. This paper reports on a 2 day expert meeting funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Hubs for Trials Methodology Research with the aims to identify current strengths and weaknesses in the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods in clinical trials, establish the next steps required to provide the trials community with guidance on the integration of mixed methods in RCTs and set-up a network of individuals, groups and organisations willing to collaborate on related methodological activity. We summarise integration techniques and go beyond previous publications by highlighting the potential value of integration using three examples that are specific to RCTs. We suggest that applying mixed methods integration techniques to data or findings from studies involving both RCTs and qualitative research can yield insights that might be useful for understanding variation in outcomes, the mechanism by which interventions have an impact, and identifying ways of tailoring therapy to patient preference and type. Given a general lack of examples and knowledge of these techniques, researchers and funders will need future guidance on how to undertake and appraise them.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31772096
pii: bmjopen-2019-032081
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032081
pmc: PMC6886933
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e032081Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L004933/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0800792
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K023233/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : SPHSU15
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12017/15
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0901335
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : HPRU-2012-10041
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K025635/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K025643/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L004933/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):e021605
pubmed: 30099395
BMJ Open. 2019 May 29;9(5):e023873
pubmed: 31147359
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):null
pubmed: 23794542
BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496
pubmed: 19744976
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Lancet. 2013 Oct 5;382(9899):1175-82
pubmed: 23915885
Qual Health Res. 2006 Mar;16(3):377-94
pubmed: 16449687
Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1261-71
pubmed: 25322972
Implement Sci. 2016 May 12;11:66
pubmed: 27175799
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56
pubmed: 24279835
BMJ. 2010 Sep 17;341:c4587
pubmed: 20851841
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):554-61
pubmed: 26553895