Comparison of different iterative CT reconstruction techniques and filtered back projection for assessment of the medial clavicular epiphysis in forensic age estimation.


Journal

International journal of legal medicine
ISSN: 1437-1596
Titre abrégé: Int J Legal Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9101456

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 08 09 2019
accepted: 13 11 2019
pubmed: 28 11 2019
medline: 15 9 2020
entrez: 28 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the impact of iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection (FBP) on image quality in computed tomography (CT)-based forensic age estimation of the medial clavicular epiphysis. CT of the clavicle was performed in 19 patients due to forensic reasons (70 mAs/140 kVp). Raw data were reconstructed with FBP and with an iterative algorithm at level 4 and 6. Clavicular ossification stage was determined by two radiologists in consensus, firstly on FBP reconstructed images and secondly after reviewing all reconstructions including iDose 4 and 6. In addition, the 3 reconstructions were compared regarding artefacts and delineation of the meta-/epiphyseal interface. Quantitative image noise was measured. Quantitative noise was lower in iDose 6 reconstructed images than in FBP (P < 0.042), but not significantly lower between iDose 4 and FBP (P = 0.127). Side by side comparison revealed lesser qualitative image noise on both iDose reconstructed images than for FBP. The meta-/epiphyseal interface delineation was rated better on both iDose levels than with FBP. In 3 of 19 patients, the clavicular ossification stage was reclassified after iterative reconstructions had been additionally reviewed. Using iterative CT reconstruction algorithms, a reduction of image noise and an enhancement of image quality regarding the meta-/epiphyseal clavicular interface can be achieved. The study highlights the importance of image standardization as variation of reconstruction technique has impact on forensic age estimation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31773319
doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02214-x
pii: 10.1007/s00414-019-02214-x
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

355-361

Références

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):621-7
pubmed: 22358002
Int J Legal Med. 2017 Sep;131(5):1391-1397
pubmed: 28608146
Skeletal Radiol. 1996 Jul;25(5):467-70
pubmed: 8837279
Int J Legal Med. 2006 Jan;120(1):15-7
pubmed: 16012831
Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2521-6
pubmed: 21822785
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020 May - Jun;14(3):219-225
pubmed: 31023632
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Apr;29(4):727-31
pubmed: 18223095
Int J Legal Med. 2017 Jan;131(1):217-224
pubmed: 27658782
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Jun;10(2):163-9
pubmed: 24277267
Int J Legal Med. 2018 May;132(3):791-798
pubmed: 28717963
Int J Legal Med. 2004 Feb;118(1):5-8
pubmed: 14534796
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 May - Jun;13(3):3-10
pubmed: 31014928
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Jul 11;113(27-28):488
pubmed: 27476715
Eur Radiol. 2011 Mar;21(3):627-35
pubmed: 21053003
Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):619-28
pubmed: 14739312
Int J Legal Med. 2010 Jul;124(4):321-5
pubmed: 20354711
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):158-66
pubmed: 20851940
Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):373-83
pubmed: 20829535
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Sep;132(5):1415-1425
pubmed: 29713801
Int J Legal Med. 2005 May;119(3):142-5
pubmed: 15711799
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Oct 28;13(11):
pubmed: 27801855
Int J Legal Med. 2010 Mar;124(2):149-54
pubmed: 20013127
Acta Radiol. 2014 Apr;55(3):335-44
pubmed: 23897308
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Mar;11(3):271-278
pubmed: 24589403
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):385-391
pubmed: 29269403
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Sep;133(5):1517-1528
pubmed: 31104134
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Jul 08;14(4):4347
pubmed: 23835395
Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):295-301
pubmed: 21927791
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Mar;132(2):629-636
pubmed: 28944440
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015 Dec;19(5):438-45
pubmed: 26696082
Int J Legal Med. 2019 May;133(3):931-934
pubmed: 30783754
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2014;58(3):283-90
pubmed: 24581030
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(10):2221-5
pubmed: 17110699
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Oct;35(10):1870-6
pubmed: 25059701

Auteurs

Magdalini Tozakidou (M)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Section of Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. magdalini.tozakidou@gmail.com.

Ilze Apine (I)

Children Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.

Kay U Petersen (KU)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Julius Matthias Weinrich (JM)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Sebastian Schindera (S)

Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

Eilin Jopp-van Well (E)

Department of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.

Klaus Püschel (K)

Department of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.

Jochen Herrmann (J)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Section of Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH