Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD).

Antiarrhythmic Catheter ablation LVAD: Left ventricular assist device VA: Ventricular arrhythmia

Journal

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 1092-8464
Titre abrégé: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9815942

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Nov 2019
Historique:
entrez: 28 11 2019
pubmed: 28 11 2019
medline: 28 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a well-known treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical therapy and is recognized both as bridge to transplant and a destination therapy. The risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is common after LVAD implantation. We review the pathophysiology and recent advances in the management of VA in LVAD patients. VAs are most likely to occur in the early post-operative periods after LVAD implantation and a prior history of VA is the most important risk factor. Post-LVAD VAs are usually well tolerated with less morbidity and decreased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, risk of right heart failure in the setting of persistent VAs is being increasingly recognized. The mechanisms of post-LVAD VAs may vary depending on the time from LVAD implantation. Electrical remodeling may play an important role in the immediate post-implant phase. Preexisting myocardial scar and to a lesser extent mechanical irritation from the LVAD cannula are important in the later phases. Most LVAD patients have a previously placed implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The benefit of implanting a new ICD in LVAD patients is unknown and should be individualized. For ICD programming, a conservative strategy with higher detection zones and prolonged time to detection is usually recommended aiming to minimize ICD shocks. More aggressive programming is appropriate if the VA results in hemodynamic instability. Antiarrhythmic drugs including amiodarone, mexiletine, and beta blockers are usually the first-line therapy for VAs. Catheter ablation has been shown to be safe and effective in LVAD recipients with recurrent VAs not responsive to antiarrhythmic drugs. LVAD-related VA is most frequently reentrant secondary to myocardial scar and usually well tolerated. Management options include antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31773322
doi: 10.1007/s11936-019-0783-7
pii: 10.1007/s11936-019-0783-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

75

Références

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Jun;6(3):648-54
pubmed: 23778248
Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Jun;12(6):593-9
pubmed: 20406799
ASAIO J. 2014 May-Jun;60(3):311-6
pubmed: 24614361
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):440-450
pubmed: 27959709
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 May;35(5):e144-8
pubmed: 21679198
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 03;361(23):2241-51
pubmed: 19920051
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;116(9):1385-90
pubmed: 26361826
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1207-13
pubmed: 22520722
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jul;28(7):733-5
pubmed: 19560703
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1165-9
pubmed: 17765615
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Jul;29(7):771-6
pubmed: 20347337
N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 30;357(9):885-96
pubmed: 17761592
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jan;5(1):39-51
pubmed: 30678785
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;28(1):68-77
pubmed: 27766717
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Jun;9(6):859-64
pubmed: 22293139
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Oct;31(10):1246-52
pubmed: 18811803
Tex Heart Inst J. 2017 Oct 1;44(5):357-360
pubmed: 29259511
Am Heart J. 2012 Sep;164(3):373-8
pubmed: 22980304
ASAIO Trans. 1991 Jul-Sep;37(3):M516-7
pubmed: 1751260
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Apr;7(4):466-71
pubmed: 20178869
JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):165-71
pubmed: 16403928
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Jan;28(1):41-50
pubmed: 28734595
Circulation. 2001 Sep 11;104(11):1241-7
pubmed: 11551874
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 2;72(14):e91-e220
pubmed: 29097296
J Card Fail. 2005 Apr;11(3):227-32
pubmed: 15812752
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Dec;24(7):1688-91
pubmed: 7963116
ASAIO Trans. 1991 Jul-Sep;37(3):M427-8
pubmed: 1751221
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 3;45(9):1428-34
pubmed: 15862414
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 May;23(5):515-20
pubmed: 22081967
Circulation. 2005 Sep 20;112(12):e154-235
pubmed: 16160202
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;35(11):1377-83
pubmed: 22946711
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 15;7(12):
pubmed: 29907652
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 11;3(12):1412-1424
pubmed: 29759673
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jun 17;340(24):1855-62
pubmed: 10369848
Circulation. 2019 May 14;139(20):e967-e989
pubmed: 30943783
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Aug;26(8):819-25
pubmed: 17692786
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Oct;88(4):1162-70
pubmed: 19766801
ASAIO J. 2018 Nov/Dec;64(6):e151-e155
pubmed: 29608491
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;8(3):592-7
pubmed: 25870335

Auteurs

Azza Ahmed (A)

Department of Hospital Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI, USA.

Mustapha Amin (M)

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Barry A Boilson (BA)

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Ammar M Killu (AM)

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Malini Madhavan (M)

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. madhavan.malini@mayo.edu.

Classifications MeSH