Adenosine Triphosphate-Bioluminescence Technology as an Adjunct Tool to Validate Cleanliness of Surgical Instruments.


Journal

AORN journal
ISSN: 1878-0369
Titre abrégé: AORN J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372403

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2019
Historique:
entrez: 28 11 2019
pubmed: 28 11 2019
medline: 12 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Perioperative and sterile processing department personnel commonly use visual inspection to validate surgical instrument cleanliness. This validation process does not detect microbes (eg, bacteria, viruses) and the resultant inadequately decontaminated instruments can put patients at risk for developing surgical site infections. Sterile processing department personnel should use a rapid, straightforward method to validate surgical instrument cleanliness objectively. During a quality improvement project at a military treatment facility, staff members found that adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-based technology was a viable and affordable solution for detecting bioburden and validating cleaning practices. The project design compared manually and mechanically cleaned cannulated instruments (59 of each) and identified 16 contaminated instruments, 14 of which had been manually cleaned. The contamination rate after mechanical cleaning was significantly lower (P = .0022) compared with manual cleaning. As a result of this quality improvement project, this facility fully implemented the technology to validate instrument cleaning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31774154
doi: 10.1002/aorn.12864
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adenosine Triphosphate 8L70Q75FXE

Types de publication

Journal Article Validation Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

596-604

Informations de copyright

© AORN, Inc, 2019.

Références

O'Sullivan KE, Kreaden US, Hebert AE, Eaton D, Redmond KC. A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;8(2):174-193.
Bel JC, Carret JP. Total hip arthroplasty with minimal invasive surgery in elderly patients with neck of femur fractures: our institutional experience. Injury. 2015;46(suppl 1):S13-S17.
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. ANSI/AAMI ST79:2017. Comprehensive Guide to Steam Sterilization and Sterility Assurance in Health Care Facilities. Arlington, VA: AAMI; 2017.
Young M. Lumens and endoscopes: meeting cleaning basics. OR Manager. 2012;28(8):22-25.
Guideline for processing flexible endoscopes. In: Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2019:199-288.
Guideline for cleaning and care of surgical instruments. In: Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2019:401-440.
Davis J. Retained bioburden on surgical instruments after reprocessing: are we just scraping the surface? Pa Patient Saf Authority. 2017;14(2):71-75.
Fernando G, Collignon P, Beckingham W. ATP bioluminescence to validate the decontamination process of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Infect Dis Health. 2014;19(2):59-64.
Marchetti A, Rossiter R. Economic burden of healthcare-associated infection in US acute care hospitals: societal perspective. J Med Econ. 2013;16(12):1399-1404.
Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. Health care-associated infection: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):2039-2046.
Tosh PK, Disbot M, Duffy JM, et al. Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa surgical site infections after arthroscopic procedures: Texas, 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(12):1179-1186.
Ongoing safety review of arthroscopic shavers: FDA safety communication. US Food and Drug Administration. http://friim​edical.com/main/wp-con​te​nt/uploa​ds/2014/07/Safety_Commu​nicat​ions_Ongoi​ng_Safety_Review_of_Arthr​oscop​ic_Shave​rs_FDA_Safety_Commu​nicat​ion.pdf. July 2014. Accessed August 7, 2019.
Endoscopy Procedures at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: What Happened, What Has Changed? Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, 111th Cong, 1st Sess (2009). https​://www.govin​fo.gov/conte​nt/pkg/CHRG-111hh​rg518​67/html/CHRG-111hh​rg518​67.htm. Accessed August 7, 2019.
Doll M, Stevens M, Bearman G. Environmental cleaning and disinfection of patient areas. Int J Infect Dis. 2018;67:52-57.
Lipscomb IP, Sihota AK, Keevil CW. Comparison between visual analysis and microscope assessment of surgical instrument cleanliness from sterile service departments. J Hosp Infect. 2008;68(1):52-58.
Huang YS, Chen YC, Chen MI, et al. Comparing visual inspection, aerobic colony counts, and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay for evaluating surface cleanliness at a medical center. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(8):882-886.
Sethi S, Huang RJ, Barakat MT, Banaei N, Friedland S, Banerjee S. Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for bacteriologic surveillance and reprocessing strategies for minimizing risk infection by duodenoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(6):1180-1187.
Valigra L. ATP bioluminescence moves mainstream. Food Quality & Safety. https​://www.foodq​ualit​y​ands​afety.com/artic​le/atp-biolu​mines​cence-moves-mains​tream/​?singl​epage​=1. Published June 1, 2010. Accessed August 8, 2019.
Veiga-Malta I. Preventing healthcare-associated infections by monitoring the cleanliness of medical devices and other critical points in a sterilization service. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2016;50(suppl 3):45-52.
Guideline for environmental cleaning. In: Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2019:173-198.
Richard RD, Bowen TR. What orthopaedic operating room surfaces are contaminated with bioburden? A study using ATP bioluminescence assay. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(7):1819-1824.
Amodio E, Dino C. Use of ATP bioluminescence for assessing the cleanliness of hospital surfaces: a review of the published literature (1990-2012). J Infect Public Health. 2014;7(2):92-98.
Ruhof Healthcare. Test Swab: For use with ATP Complete Contamination Monitoring System. https​://​cdn.shopi​fy.com/s/files/​1/1030/1609/files/​ATP_TEST_SWAB_Tech_8.11.15.pdf?75961​90209​96901​2802.2009. Accessed August 7, 2019.
Smith K, Araoye I, Gilbert S, et al. Is retained bone debris in cannulated orthopedic instruments sterile after autoclaving? Am J Infect Control. 2018;46(9):1009-1013.

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH