Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab After Prior Pertuzumab-Based Therapy Among Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Deoxycytidine
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Progression-Free Survival
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ genetics
Trastuzumab
/ administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
Gemcitabine
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2019
01 11 2019
Historique:
entrez:
28
11
2019
pubmed:
28
11
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Taxanes with trastuzumab and pertuzumab for initial treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2, formerly HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. While continued use of trastuzumab in therapeutic combinations after disease progression is standard, the efficacy of continuing pertuzumab is unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab in combination with gemcitabine and trastuzumab after prior treatment with pertuzumab for ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer. This is a phase 2 single-arm clinical trial of dual anti-ERBB2 therapy after prior treatment with pertuzumab. The study took place at a single academic center from March 2015 to April 2017 among women with ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer, prior pertuzumab-based treatment, and 3 or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens. Data were analyzed between January 2019 and March 2019. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine, 1200 mg/m2 (later amended to 1000 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, plus trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg) and pertuzumab (840-mg loading dose, then 420 mg) once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was 3-month PFS. Based on prior trials, a target rate of 70% or higher was selected as the promising progression-free rate at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included safety, tolerability, and overall survival. A total of 45 patients (median [range] age, 57.1 [31.7-77.2] years) were enrolled; 22 (49%) were treated in the second-line setting, and 23 (51%) were treated in the third-line setting or beyond. Of these, 22 (49%) received prior trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). At a median (range) follow-up of 27.6 (8.3-36.0) months, 3-month PFS was 73.3% (95% CI, 61.5%-87.5%). Overall, median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 5.4-8.2 months). Treatment was well tolerated, with no occurrences of febrile neutropenia or symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In this phase 2 trial, treatment with gemcitabine, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab after prior pertuzumab-based therapy for ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer was associated with a 3-month PFS rate of 73.3% and was well tolerated. Continuation of pertuzumab beyond progression was associated with apparent clinical benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02252887.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31774522
pii: 2755853
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16211
pmc: PMC6902832
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Deoxycytidine
0W860991D6
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
pertuzumab
K16AIQ8CTM
Trastuzumab
P188ANX8CK
Gemcitabine
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02252887']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1916211Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):177-82
pubmed: 3798106
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1124-30
pubmed: 20124187
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Mar;10(1):1-10
pubmed: 2702835
Nature. 2003 Feb 13;421(6924):756-60
pubmed: 12610629
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 10;35(26):3030-3038
pubmed: 28437161
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):689-99
pubmed: 24793816
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):141-148
pubmed: 28056202
Oncologist. 2016 Apr;21(4):418-24
pubmed: 26984450
J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1:122S-50S
pubmed: 19403881
Cancer Cell. 2004 Apr;5(4):317-28
pubmed: 15093539
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 10;36(26):2736-2740
pubmed: 29939838
Cancer Cell. 2002 Aug;2(2):127-37
pubmed: 12204533
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19
pubmed: 22149875
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):724-34
pubmed: 25693012
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):732-742
pubmed: 28526536
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1783-91
pubmed: 23020162
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 10;33(5):442-7
pubmed: 25547504
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10;30(14):1594-600
pubmed: 22393084