Insights from invasion ecology: Can consideration of eco-evolutionary experience promote benefits from root mutualisms in plant production?
Adaptation
biological invasions
co-introduction
crop breeding
crop plant domestication
crop wild relative
ecological fitting
plant–microbe interactions
range expansion
root microbiomes
Journal
AoB PLANTS
ISSN: 2041-2851
Titre abrégé: AoB Plants
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101539425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
16
04
2019
accepted:
13
09
2019
entrez:
29
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
30
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mutualistic plant-microbial functioning relies on co-adapted symbiotic partners as well as conducive environmental conditions. Choosing particular plant genotypes for domestication and subsequent cultivar selection can narrow the gene pools of crop plants to a degree that they are no longer able to benefit from microbial mutualists. Elevated mineral nutrient levels in cultivated soils also reduce the dependence of crops on nutritional support by mutualists such as mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia. Thus, current ways of crop production are predestined to compromise the propagation and function of microbial symbionts, limiting their long-term benefits for plant yield stability. The influence of mutualists on non-native plant establishment and spread, i.e. biological invasions, provides an unexplored analogue to contemporary crop production that accounts for mutualistic services from symbionts like rhizobia and mycorrhizae. The historical exposure of organisms to biotic interactions over evolutionary timescales, or so-called eco-evolutionary experience (EEE), has been used to explain the success of such invasions. In this paper, we stress that consideration of the EEE concept can shed light on how to overcome the loss of microbial mutualist functions following crop domestication and breeding. We propose specific experimental approaches to utilize the wild ancestors of crops to determine whether crop domestication compromised the benefits derived from root microbial symbioses or not. This can predict the potential for success of mutualistic symbiosis manipulation in modern crops and the maintenance of effective microbial mutualisms over the long term.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31777649
doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plz060
pii: plz060
pmc: PMC6863469
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
plz060Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.
Références
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 22;274(1629):3119-26
pubmed: 17939985
Oecologia. 2005 Jun;144(1):1-11
pubmed: 15891837
New Phytol. 2018 Feb;217(3):1254-1266
pubmed: 29034978
New Phytol. 2009 Mar;181(4):960-73
pubmed: 19170899
Ecol Lett. 2009 Jan;12(1):13-21
pubmed: 19019195
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb;33(2):129-142
pubmed: 29241940
Nature. 2003 Sep 4;425(6953):78-81
pubmed: 12955144
New Phytol. 2017 Sep;215(4):1354-1360
pubmed: 28771816
Nat Commun. 2017 Apr 07;8:14790
pubmed: 28387250
Mycorrhiza. 2019 Jan;29(1):39-49
pubmed: 30443805
PLoS Genet. 2014 Jul 17;10(7):e1004487
pubmed: 25032823
Ecol Lett. 2015 Mar;18(3):236-45
pubmed: 25626585
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Jul;22(7):583-595
pubmed: 28549621
Genes (Basel). 2017 Dec 22;9(1):null
pubmed: 29271943
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27935
pubmed: 22174755
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr;3(4):604-611
pubmed: 30911144
Oecologia. 2012 Sep;170(1):253-61
pubmed: 22419481
Interface Focus. 2017 Oct 6;7(5):20170001
pubmed: 28839925
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Oct 01;:null
pubmed: 30272678
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 28;109(35):14058-62
pubmed: 22891306
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):65-93
pubmed: 10740893
AoB Plants. 2016 Sep 11;8:null
pubmed: 27535176
Evolution. 2015 Mar;69(3):631-42
pubmed: 25565449
Nat Plants. 2018 May;4(5):247-257
pubmed: 29725101
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 7;103(45):16666-71
pubmed: 17068128
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 13;9(1):649
pubmed: 29440741
New Phytol. 2017 Apr;214(1):412-423
pubmed: 27879004
Curr Biol. 2011 Sep 27;21(18):R775-85
pubmed: 21959168
AoB Plants. 2016 Jul 11;8:null
pubmed: 27255514
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Oct 27;7:1625
pubmed: 27833637
ISME J. 2015 May;9(5):1053-61
pubmed: 25350159
Ecol Lett. 2006 May;9(5):501-15
pubmed: 16643296
Mycorrhiza. 2007 Sep;17(6):507-517
pubmed: 17356853
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Jul 14;6:507
pubmed: 26236319
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Aug;44:7-15
pubmed: 29289792
New Phytol. 2010 Jul;187(2):475-84
pubmed: 20456067
New Phytol. 2017 Sep;215(4):1314-1332
pubmed: 28649741
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):431-49
pubmed: 17908213
Nat Plants. 2018 Aug;4(8):512-520
pubmed: 30061748
New Phytol. 2018 Dec;220(4):1135-1140
pubmed: 29658105
PLoS Biol. 2017 Mar 28;15(3):e2001793
pubmed: 28350798
New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(1):577-587
pubmed: 30067296
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Sep 29;5:501
pubmed: 25324851
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(2):645-647
pubmed: 30895649
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):91-96
pubmed: 30451287
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 30;7:373
pubmed: 27066028
Mol Ecol. 2012 Aug;21(16):4122-36
pubmed: 22703050
Cell. 2006 Dec 29;127(7):1309-21
pubmed: 17190597
New Phytol. 2017 Jul;215(1):40-56
pubmed: 28211601
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Oct;70(10):5980-7
pubmed: 15466541
Evol Appl. 2010 Sep;3(5-6):547-60
pubmed: 25567946
New Phytol. 2018 Apr;218(1):322-334
pubmed: 29281758