Midfacial Advancement Line-A Comparative Evaluation of a New Measurement Method in Orthognathic Surgery.

In planning intraoral quadrangular Le Fort II osteotomy (IQLFIIO), simulation of hard and soft tissue changes will be important at the infraorbital, Le Fort I, and incisor level. The aim of our study was to evaluate a new method for visualization and quantification. Three different methods of quantification were compared: the point-to-point (PTP) measurement, which has been viewed as the reference standard; part comparison analysis (PCA); and a new method, the midfacial advancement line (MFAL) measurement. We performed a measurement comparison study using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement and enrolled patients with midfacial deficiency and Class III malocclusion who had undergone IQLFIIO. The primary predictor variable was the method of measurement. The primary outcome variable was the amount of midfacial advancement. We also investigated the time required, visualization quality, and interobserver agreement. The sample included 12 subjects with a mean age of 21.6 years; 7 patients were male. The PTP and MFAL showed no significant observer dependence. The advancement measured with PTP and MFAL showed no significant differences. However, the advancement measured using MFAL and PCA showed a significant difference. The highest rating of visualization was found for MFAL. The time requirements were similar for all 3 methods. Our results have shown that the MFAL is a suitable method for visualization and quantification of soft and hard tissue changes at all 3 face levels in 1 image. It could be a valuable tool for virtual planning of midfacial advancement surgery.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.