Parents' and carers' awareness and perceptions of UK supermarket policies on less healthy food at checkouts: A qualitative study.


Journal

Appetite
ISSN: 1095-8304
Titre abrégé: Appetite
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2020
Historique:
received: 05 08 2019
revised: 31 10 2019
accepted: 25 11 2019
pubmed: 30 11 2019
medline: 4 2 2021
entrez: 29 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the retail environment strategic placement of food influences purchasing. Foods placed at checkouts have tended to be less healthy. In response to consumer concern some UK supermarkets voluntarily committed to removing less healthy food from their checkouts. We explored qualitatively the perceptions and experiences of parents and carers of younger children regarding food at supermarket checkouts, supermarket checkout food policies, and other supermarket stimuli which influences purchasing. Twelve focus groups were conducted in urban central Scotland with 91 parents/carers of primary school aged children (aged 5-11 years). The availability of less healthy foods at checkouts was perceived as problematic, encouraging purchase requests by children and impulse buys by adults. Parents/carers were aware of a change in some supermarkets where less healthy foods had been replaced with healthier items and they were supportive of supermarket policies that placed restrictions on checkout food. Many parents/carers welcomed product-free checkouts, however the whole supermarket was perceived as manipulative and stimulating. Voluntary supermarket policies which clearly and consistently restrict the placement of less healthy foods at checkouts have been welcomed by parents/carers of young children. Given that marketing strategies throughout the whole supermarket were viewed as problematic, public health policymakers and advocacy groups may want to encourage supermarkets to develop broader policies to support healthier food purchasing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In the retail environment strategic placement of food influences purchasing. Foods placed at checkouts have tended to be less healthy. In response to consumer concern some UK supermarkets voluntarily committed to removing less healthy food from their checkouts. We explored qualitatively the perceptions and experiences of parents and carers of younger children regarding food at supermarket checkouts, supermarket checkout food policies, and other supermarket stimuli which influences purchasing.
METHODS
Twelve focus groups were conducted in urban central Scotland with 91 parents/carers of primary school aged children (aged 5-11 years).
RESULTS
The availability of less healthy foods at checkouts was perceived as problematic, encouraging purchase requests by children and impulse buys by adults. Parents/carers were aware of a change in some supermarkets where less healthy foods had been replaced with healthier items and they were supportive of supermarket policies that placed restrictions on checkout food. Many parents/carers welcomed product-free checkouts, however the whole supermarket was perceived as manipulative and stimulating.
CONCLUSION
Voluntary supermarket policies which clearly and consistently restrict the placement of less healthy foods at checkouts have been welcomed by parents/carers of young children. Given that marketing strategies throughout the whole supermarket were viewed as problematic, public health policymakers and advocacy groups may want to encourage supermarkets to develop broader policies to support healthier food purchasing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31778731
pii: S0195-6663(19)31004-9
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104541
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104541

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K023187/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K02325X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR-RP-02-12-001
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Allison Ford (A)

Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. Electronic address: a.j.ford@stir.ac.uk.

Douglas Eadie (D)

Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Jean Adams (J)

Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.

Ashley Adamson (A)

Fuse-the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health and Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, UK.

Martin White (M)

Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.

Martine Stead (M)

Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH