Validation of an epigenetic field of susceptibility to detect significant prostate cancer from non-tumor biopsies.
DNA methylation
Epigenetics
Field defect
Prostate cancer
Journal
Clinical epigenetics
ISSN: 1868-7083
Titre abrégé: Clin Epigenetics
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101516977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 11 2019
28 11 2019
Historique:
received:
17
06
2019
accepted:
22
10
2019
entrez:
30
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
An epigenetic field of cancer susceptibility exists for prostate cancer (PC) that gives rise to multifocal disease in the peripheral prostate. In previous work, genome-wide DNA methylation profiling identified altered regions in the normal prostate tissue of men with PC. In the current multicenter study, we examined the predictive strength of a panel of loci to detect cancer presence and grade in patients with negative biopsy tissue. Four centers contributed benign prostate biopsy tissues blocks from 129 subjects that were either tumor associated (TA, Grade Group [GG] ≥ 2, n = 77) or non-tumor associated (NTA, n = 52). Biopsies were analyzed using pyrosequencing for DNA methylation encompassing CpG loci near CAV1, EVX1, FGF1, NCR2, PLA2G16, and SPAG4 and methylation differences were detected within all gene regions (p < 0.05). A multiplex regression model for biomarker performance incorporating a gene combination discriminated TA from NTA tissues (area under the curve [AUC] 0.747, p = 0.004). A multiplex model incorporating all the above genes and clinical information (PSA, age) identified patients with GG ≥ 2 PC (AUC 0.815, p < 0.0001). In patients with cancer, increased variation in gene methylation levels occurs between biopsies across the prostate. A widespread epigenetic field defect is utilized to detect GG ≥ 2 PC in patients with histologically negative biopsies. These alterations in non-tumor cells display increased heterogeneity of methylation extent and are spatially distant from tumor foci. These findings have the potential to decrease the need for repeated prostate biopsy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
An epigenetic field of cancer susceptibility exists for prostate cancer (PC) that gives rise to multifocal disease in the peripheral prostate. In previous work, genome-wide DNA methylation profiling identified altered regions in the normal prostate tissue of men with PC. In the current multicenter study, we examined the predictive strength of a panel of loci to detect cancer presence and grade in patients with negative biopsy tissue.
RESULTS
Four centers contributed benign prostate biopsy tissues blocks from 129 subjects that were either tumor associated (TA, Grade Group [GG] ≥ 2, n = 77) or non-tumor associated (NTA, n = 52). Biopsies were analyzed using pyrosequencing for DNA methylation encompassing CpG loci near CAV1, EVX1, FGF1, NCR2, PLA2G16, and SPAG4 and methylation differences were detected within all gene regions (p < 0.05). A multiplex regression model for biomarker performance incorporating a gene combination discriminated TA from NTA tissues (area under the curve [AUC] 0.747, p = 0.004). A multiplex model incorporating all the above genes and clinical information (PSA, age) identified patients with GG ≥ 2 PC (AUC 0.815, p < 0.0001). In patients with cancer, increased variation in gene methylation levels occurs between biopsies across the prostate.
CONCLUSIONS
A widespread epigenetic field defect is utilized to detect GG ≥ 2 PC in patients with histologically negative biopsies. These alterations in non-tumor cells display increased heterogeneity of methylation extent and are spatially distant from tumor foci. These findings have the potential to decrease the need for repeated prostate biopsy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31779677
doi: 10.1186/s13148-019-0771-5
pii: 10.1186/s13148-019-0771-5
pmc: PMC6883627
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
168Références
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1110-6
pubmed: 22999998
Nat Genet. 1997 Nov;17(3):350-2
pubmed: 9354805
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 8;7(1):3090
pubmed: 28596594
Neoplasia. 2013 Apr;15(4):399-408
pubmed: 23555185
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 29;7:10478
pubmed: 26823093
Prostate. 2011 Nov;71(15):1621-30
pubmed: 21432864
Prostate. 2013 Dec;73(16):1721-30
pubmed: 23999928
Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Aug;12(8):435-44
pubmed: 26171803
J Biol Chem. 2004 Dec 10;279(50):52218-26
pubmed: 15471867
Cancer Res. 2010 Oct 15;70(20):8169-78
pubmed: 20841482
Cancer Lett. 2016 Jun 1;375(2):360-366
pubmed: 26971491
Cell Rep. 2017 Aug 15;20(7):1609-1622
pubmed: 28813673
J Urol. 2002 Jun;167(6):2435-9
pubmed: 11992052
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2335-41
pubmed: 23159584
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1830-4
pubmed: 21944136
Genome Med. 2012 Mar 27;4(3):24
pubmed: 22453031