Feasibility study of finalizing the extended adjuvant temozolomide based on methionine positron emission tomography (Met-PET) findings in patients with glioblastoma.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ therapeutic use
Brain Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Carbon Radioisotopes
/ metabolism
Case-Control Studies
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glioblastoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Methionine
/ metabolism
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Positron-Emission Tomography
/ methods
Progression-Free Survival
Retrospective Studies
Temozolomide
/ therapeutic use
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 11 2019
28 11 2019
Historique:
received:
12
07
2019
accepted:
14
11
2019
entrez:
30
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, there is no standard duration for adjuvant temozolomide treatment. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of finalizing adjuvant temozolomide treatment on the basis of methionine uptake in methionine positron emission tomography (Met-PET). We conducted a retrospective review of glioblastoma patients who underwent more than twelve cycles of temozolomide (extended temozolomide) treatment after resection and concomitant chemoradiotherapy with no evidence of recurrence on MRI. In addition to the methionine uptake value at the completion of extended temozolomide, local and distant recurrence and progression-free survival were also analyzed. Forty-four patients completed the extended temozolomide treatment. Among these, 18 experienced some type of tumor recurrence within one year. A Tmax/Nave value of 2.0 was the optimal cut-off value indicating progression. More than 80% of the patients with low methionine uptake completed the temozolomide treatment, and subsequent basic MRI observations showed no recurrence within one year after Met-PET. Subgroups with high uptake (≥2.0), even with continuation of temozolomide treatment, showed more frequent tumor progression than patients with low uptake (<2.0) who completed the extended temozolomide treatment (p < 0.001, odds ratio 14.7, 95% CI 3.46-62.3). The tumor recurrence rate increased in stepwise manner according to methionine uptake. Finalization of the extended temozolomide treatment on the basis of low uptake value was feasible with a low recurrence rate. Compared to MRI, Met-PET shows better ability to predict tumor progression in long-term glioblastoma survivors with extended temozolomide use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31780768
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54398-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-54398-2
pmc: PMC6883069
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Carbon Radioisotopes
0
Methionine
AE28F7PNPL
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17794Références
J Neurooncol. 2017 Mar;132(1):181-188
pubmed: 28116649
J Neurooncol. 2017 Sep;134(2):357-362
pubmed: 28669012
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Apr 9;20(5):666-673
pubmed: 29126203
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;20(4):546-556
pubmed: 29016887
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3575-3584
pubmed: 28193626
J Nucl Med. 2001 Mar;42(3):432-45
pubmed: 11337520
Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):459-66
pubmed: 19269895
Neurology. 2007 Feb 27;68(9):688-90
pubmed: 17325277
J Nucl Med. 2008 May;49(5):694-9
pubmed: 18413375
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):997-1003
pubmed: 15758010
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Mar 1;97(3):487-494
pubmed: 28011051
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jun;114(6):1640-7
pubmed: 21214332
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):699-708
pubmed: 24552317
J Neurosurg. 2009 Jan;110(1):163-72
pubmed: 18847337
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:733-740
pubmed: 28434963
Oncologist. 2017 May;22(5):570-575
pubmed: 28360216
Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Dec;37(6):E4
pubmed: 25434389
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):1898-1909
pubmed: 28411277
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1027-1037
pubmed: 28296618
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;19(8):1119-1126
pubmed: 28371907
J Neurooncol. 2012 Jan;106(1):127-33
pubmed: 21725801
Cancer Cell Int. 2016 May 05;16:36
pubmed: 27158244
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306-2316
pubmed: 29260225
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1100-8
pubmed: 25163906
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1373-1385
pubmed: 28844499
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 10;31(32):4085-91
pubmed: 24101040
J Neurooncol. 2012 May;108(1):173-7
pubmed: 22382781
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1963-72
pubmed: 20231676
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Sep 1;93(1):133-40
pubmed: 26130232
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 1;26(25):4189-99
pubmed: 18757334
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov;136(11):1691-5
pubmed: 20177703
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Mar;38(3):E14
pubmed: 25727223
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):189-193
pubmed: 24336570
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):709-22
pubmed: 24552318