Grafting Cucumber Onto Pumpkin Induced Early Stomatal Closure by Increasing ABA Sensitivity Under Salinity Conditions.
abscisic acid
cucumber
grafting
rootstock
salt tolerance
stomata
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
25
07
2019
accepted:
17
09
2019
entrez:
30
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
30
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During early periods of salt stress, reduced stomatal opening can prevent water loss and wilting. Abscisic acid (ABA) signal plays an important role in this process. Here, we show that cucumber grafted onto pumpkin exhibits rapid stomatal closure, which helps plants to adapt to osmotic stress caused by salinity. Increased ABA contents in the roots, xylem sap, and leaves were evaluated in two grafting combinations (self-grafted cucumber and cucumber grafted onto pumpkin rootstock). The expression levels of ABA biosynthetic or signaling related genes
Identifiants
pubmed: 31781131
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01290
pmc: PMC6859870
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1290Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Niu, Sun, Nawaz, Sun, Cao, Lu, Huang and Bie.
Références
Plant Physiol. 2017 Jun;174(2):732-747
pubmed: 28232585
New Phytol. 2014 Apr;202(1):35-49
pubmed: 24283512
Plant Physiol. 2011 May;156(1):430-8
pubmed: 21402795
J Integr Plant Biol. 2018 Jan;60(1):16-33
pubmed: 29052969
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(1):37-43
pubmed: 17595196
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Mar 10;8:316
pubmed: 28344585
Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Dec;29(12):2185-97
pubmed: 17081251
Physiol Plant. 2014 Dec;152(4):738-48
pubmed: 24813633
Plant Methods. 2012 Jan 15;8(1):2
pubmed: 22243810
J Plant Physiol. 2013 Jan 15;170(2):220-4
pubmed: 23181973
Science. 2014 May 16;344(6185):711-6
pubmed: 24833385
Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):195-210
pubmed: 11841663
J Plant Physiol. 2012 Feb 15;169(3):255-61
pubmed: 22115741
Planta. 2009 Feb;229(3):605-15
pubmed: 19048288
Plant Cell. 2015 Jan;27(1):64-70
pubmed: 25604442
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Sep 30;7:1489
pubmed: 27746808
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Feb;15(2):183-196
pubmed: 27420922
Plant J. 2019 Oct;100(1):55-67
pubmed: 31148333
Plant Cell. 2011 Sep;23(9):3482-97
pubmed: 21954467
J Exp Bot. 2002 Jun;53(373):1503-14
pubmed: 12021298
Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 Jun;56(6):1043-52
pubmed: 25917608
J Exp Bot. 2010 Feb;61(4):1205-13
pubmed: 20054031
Plant Cell. 2015 Jul;27(7):1945-54
pubmed: 26163575
Front Plant Sci. 2016 May 04;7:571
pubmed: 27200044
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651-81
pubmed: 18444910
J Exp Bot. 2015 Apr;66(8):2227-37
pubmed: 25770586
J Biol Chem. 2002 Jan 25;277(4):2413-8
pubmed: 11707435
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Apr;36(4):856-68
pubmed: 23050986
J Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;220:173-180
pubmed: 29195231
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jun 19;69(14):3465-3476
pubmed: 29145593
J Exp Bot. 2011 Mar;62(6):1731-41
pubmed: 21131549
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Mar;32(3):237-49
pubmed: 19054352
Plant J. 2007 Oct;52(1):167-74
pubmed: 17711416
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Dec;46:87-95
pubmed: 30138845
J Integr Plant Biol. 2013 Apr;55(4):294-388
pubmed: 23462277
New Phytol. 2010 Nov;188(3):750-61
pubmed: 20696009
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):317
pubmed: 31307384
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 02;6:20212
pubmed: 26832070
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Apr;33(4):510-25
pubmed: 19843256
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):281-7
pubmed: 18467158
Plant Cell. 2004 May;16(5):1143-62
pubmed: 15084716