Computed Tomography to Cone Beam Computed Tomography Deformable Image Registration for Contour Propagation Using Head and Neck, Patient-Based Computational Phantoms: A Multicenter Study.
Journal
Practical radiation oncology
ISSN: 1879-8519
Titre abrégé: Pract Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558279
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
01
07
2019
revised:
22
10
2019
accepted:
12
11
2019
pubmed:
2
12
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
2
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the performance of various algorithms for deformable image registration (DIR) for propagating regions of interest (ROIs) using multiple commercial platforms, from computed tomography to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and megavoltage computed tomography. Fourteen institutions participated in the study using 5 commercial platforms: RayStation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden), MIM (Cleveland, OH), VelocityAI and SmartAdapt (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), and ABAS (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Algorithms were tested on synthetic images generated with the ImSimQA (Oncology Systems Limited, Shrewsbury, UK) package by applying 2 specific deformation vector fields (DVF) to real head and neck patient datasets. On-board images from 3 systems were used: megavoltage computed tomography from Tomotherapy and 2 kinds of CBCT from a clinical linear accelerator. Image quality of the system was evaluated. The algorithms' accuracy was assessed by comparing the DIR-mapped ROIs returned by each center with those of the reference, using the Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to conformity metrics. Statistical inference on the validation results was carried out to identify the prognostic factors of DIR performance. Analyzing 840 DIR-mapped ROIs returned by the centers, it was demonstrated that DVF intensity and image quality were significant prognostic factors of DIR performance. The accuracy of the propagated contours was generally high, and acceptable DIR performance can be obtained with lower-dose CBCT image protocols. The performance of the systems proved to be image quality specific, depending on the DVF type and only partially on the platforms. All systems proved to be robust against image artifacts and noise, except the demon-based software.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31786233
pii: S1879-8500(19)30360-1
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.11.011
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
125-132Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.