Intergenerational effects of CO
Poecilia reticulata
acidification
carbon dioxide
climate change
development
fishes
food availability
freshwater
growth rate
intergenerational effects
maternal acclimation
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
11
02
2019
revised:
11
09
2019
accepted:
12
09
2019
entrez:
3
12
2019
pubmed:
4
12
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are driving decreases in aquatic pH. As a result, there has been a surge in the number of studies examining the impact of acidification on aquatic fauna over the past decade. Thus far, both positive and negative impacts on the growth of fish have been reported, creating a disparity in results. Food availability and single-generation exposure have been proposed as some of the reasons for these variable results, where unrealistically high food treatments lead to fish overcoming the energetic costs associated with acclimating to decreased pH. Likewise, exposure of fish to lower pH for only one generation may not capture the likely ecological response to acidification that wild populations might experience over two or more generations. Here we compare somatic growth rates of laboratory populations of the Trinidadian guppy (
Identifiants
pubmed: 31788218
doi: 10.1002/ece3.5761
pii: ECE35761
pmc: PMC6875657
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
12836-12845Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ecol Evol. 2019 Oct 29;9(22):12836-12845
pubmed: 31788218
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 28;7(1):4313
pubmed: 28659598
J Exp Biol. 2014 Mar 1;217(Pt 5):651-62
pubmed: 24574381
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 22;282(1821):20151954
pubmed: 26674946
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 7;275(1636):781-5
pubmed: 18182373
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Aug 26;368(1627):20120447
pubmed: 23980246
Nature. 2008 May 15;453(7193):379-82
pubmed: 18480821
Oecologia. 2011 Oct;167(2):391-400
pubmed: 21516310
Trends Mol Med. 2015 Feb;21(2):134-44
pubmed: 25601643
Ecol Lett. 2010 Nov;13(11):1419-34
pubmed: 20958904
Nature. 1976 Feb 5;259(5542):391-2
pubmed: 2875
Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8348
pubmed: 29844541
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014 Nov 1;307(9):R1061-84
pubmed: 25163920
Evolution. 2009 May;63(5):1341-7
pubmed: 19425199
Science. 1992 Apr 3;256(5053):74-9
pubmed: 17802595
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191947
pubmed: 29370273
Evolution. 1989 May;43(3):485-503
pubmed: 28568400
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Apr;19(4):1017-27
pubmed: 23504880
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Jun;94(3):849-873
pubmed: 30467930
J Exp Zool. 2002 Aug 1;293(3):302-19
pubmed: 12115903
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Mar;25(3):839-849
pubmed: 30570815
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2012 Jan;161(1):61-8
pubmed: 21945112
Evol Appl. 2018 Dec 31;12(3):560-571
pubmed: 30828374
J Anim Ecol. 2008 Sep;77(5):1038-46
pubmed: 18631260
Ecol Lett. 2016 Jan;19(1):98-108
pubmed: 26610406
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 22;273(1591):1281-6
pubmed: 16720403
J Exp Biol. 2018 Mar 7;221(Pt 5):
pubmed: 29514874
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1960 Aug;35:324-63
pubmed: 13785698
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 22;276(1671):3275-83
pubmed: 19556256
Science. 1988 Jan 8;239(4836):149-57
pubmed: 17732976
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 May;2(5):836-840
pubmed: 29556079
Am Nat. 2001 Feb;157(2):126-40
pubmed: 18707267
J Exp Biol. 1994 Aug;193(1):79-95
pubmed: 9317374
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):998-1007
pubmed: 20545728
Evolution. 2015 Jun;69(6):1461-1475
pubmed: 25908306
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2001 Sep;130(2):219-40
pubmed: 11544069
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 May 1;16(5):254-260
pubmed: 11301155
Conserv Physiol. 2013 Sep 21;1(1):cot023
pubmed: 27293607
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2006 Nov;154(1-2):199-215
pubmed: 16777496
Evolution. 1982 Jan;36(1):160-177
pubmed: 28581096
Am Nat. 2008 Feb;171(2):225-37
pubmed: 18197775
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 29;6:34480
pubmed: 27682149