The 3D reconstructed skin micronucleus assay: considerations for optimal protocol design.
Journal
Mutagenesis
ISSN: 1464-3804
Titre abrégé: Mutagenesis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8707812
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 04 2021
28 04 2021
Historique:
received:
14
06
2019
accepted:
17
10
2019
pubmed:
4
12
2019
medline:
24
8
2021
entrez:
4
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Implementation of the seventh amendment to the EU Cosmetics Directive has driven much research into suitable in vitro alternative assays to support satisfactory risk assessments. One such assay is the reconstructed skin micronucleus (RSMN) assay. First reported in 2006, further development occurred and a standard protocol was published in 2011. To evaluate and optimise the assay at Covance Laboratories, we tested nine chemicals [4-nitrophenol (4-NP), cyclohexanone (CH), 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol (2-EHD), methyl methansulfonate (MMS), mitomycin C (MMC), ethyl nitrosourea (ENU), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), cyclophosphamide (CPA) and vinblastine (VIN)] using the EpiDerm™ 3D skin model (MatTek Corporation®, IVLSL, Bratislava, Slovakia) and compared the data using the standard 48-h treatment regimen and also an emerging 72-h treatment protocol. The EpiDerm™ tissue has reportedly some metabolic capacity but data using 48-h treatments has provided mixed results. Our investigations demonstrate that the two chemicals requiring metabolic activation (BaP and CPA) were negative following the 48-h protocol but were clearly positive following 72-h treatment. Furthermore, Replication Index (RI) data showed higher RI values in vehicle control treatments (indicating increased cell division) across the treatment set following 72-h treatments. A general greater magnitude of micronucleus (MN) induction was also observed following test chemical treatment. These data suggest that the 72-h treatment protocol is more suitable as a standard approach for the detection of clastogenic, aneugenic and metabolically activated chemicals in the RSMN assay. For further assay optimisation, we compare the statistical power of scoring cells from duplicate or triplicate cultures per treatment concentration and provide recommendations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31793640
pii: 5650914
doi: 10.1093/mutage/gez037
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mutagens
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
37-49Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society.All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.