Time and cost-analysis of virtual surgical planning for head and neck reconstruction: A matched pair analysis.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Computer Simulation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Free Tissue Flaps
/ economics
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ surgery
Humans
Male
Mandibular Reconstruction
/ economics
Matched-Pair Analysis
Maxillary Osteotomy
/ economics
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Patient Care Planning
Patient-Specific Modeling
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ economics
Retrospective Studies
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Young Adult
Head and Neck
Mandible
Medical device production system
Reconstruction
Virtual Surgical Planning
Journal
Oral oncology
ISSN: 1879-0593
Titre abrégé: Oral Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9709118
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
01
05
2019
revised:
21
09
2019
accepted:
23
11
2019
pubmed:
4
12
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
4
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Virtual surgical planning (VSP) uses patient-specific modelling of the facial skeleton to provide a tailored surgical plan which may increase accuracy and reduce operating time. The aim of this study was to perform a time and cost-analysis comparing patients treated with and without VSP-technology. A retrospective analysis of 138 patients undergoing microvascular free flap mandible (76.8%) or maxillary (23.2%) reconstruction between 2010 and 2018 was performed. The cohort was divided into two groups according to reconstruction-approach: non-VSP and proprietary-VSP (P-VSP). Cost-analysis was performed comparing non-VSP and P-VSP by matching patients according to site, bone flap, indication, complexity and age. Fibula, scapula and iliac crest free flaps were used in 92 patients (66.7%), 33 patients (23.9%) and 13 patients (9.4%), respectively. Eight patients (5.8%) required revision of the microvascular anastomosis, of which four flaps were salvaged giving a 2.9% flap failure rate. P-VSP was associated with shorter median length of stay (LOS) (10.0 vs 13.0 days, p = 0.009), lower mean procedure time (507.38 vs 561.75 min, p = 0.042), and similar median total cost ($34939.00 vs $34653.00, p = 0.938), despite higher complexity (2.0 vs 1.0, p = 0.09). In the matched-series, P-VSP was associated with a similar median LOS (10.5 vs 11 days), lower mean procedure time (497 vs 555 min, p = 0.231), lower mean total cost ($35,493 v $37,345) but higher median total cost ($35504.50 vs $32391.50, p = 0.607), although not statistically different. VSP-technology represents a helpful surgical tool for complex reconstructions, without adversely impacting on the overall-cost of treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31794886
pii: S1368-8375(19)30402-6
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104491
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104491Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.