Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm.
Attention
Auditory modality
Proactive control
Test–retest reliability
Working memory
Journal
Behavior research methods
ISSN: 1554-3528
Titre abrégé: Behav Res Methods
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101244316
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
5
12
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
5
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions. Deficits in proactive control may cause multiple cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia. However, studies of cognitive control have largely relied on visual tasks, even though the functional deficits in schizophrenia are more frequent and severe in the auditory domain (i.e., hallucinations). Hence, we developed an auditory analogue of a visual ignore/suppress paradigm. Healthy adults (N = 40) listened to a series of four letters (600-ms stimulus onset asynchrony) presented alternately to each ear, followed by a 3.2-s maintenance interval and a probe. Participants were directed either to selectively ignore (I) the to-be-presented letters at one ear, to suppress (S) letters already presented to one ear, or to remember (R) all presented letters. The critical cue was provided either before (I) or after (S) the encoding series, or simultaneously with the probe (R). The probes were encoding items presented to either the attended/not suppressed ear ("valid") or the ignored/suppressed ear ("lure"), or were not presented ("control"). Replicating prior findings during visual ignore/suppress tasks, response sensitivity and latency revealed poorer performance for lure than for control trials, particularly during the suppress condition. Shorter suppress than remember latencies suggested a behavioral advantage when discarding encoded items from WM. The paradigm-related internal consistencies and 1-week test-retest reliabilities (n = 38) were good to excellent. Our findings validate these auditory WM tasks as a reliable manipulation of proactive control and set the stage for studies with schizophrenia patients who experience auditory hallucinations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31797177
doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01308-z
pii: 10.3758/s13428-019-01308-z
pmc: PMC7266708
mid: NIHMS1050340
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1161-1174Subventions
Organisme : Research Council of Norway (RCN)
ID : 221550
Pays : International
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R21 MH106905
Pays : United States
Organisme : Helse-Vest
ID : #911793
Pays : International
Organisme : European Research Council (ERC)
ID : 693124
Pays : International
Références
Schizophr Res. 2011 Mar;126(1-3):132-7
pubmed: 21211945
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 17;8:1841
pubmed: 29089917
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4507
pubmed: 19223971
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994 Apr;4(2):157-65
pubmed: 8038571
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;16(1):27-34
pubmed: 22169777
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Mar;117(1):34-50
pubmed: 2966230
Science. 1966 Aug 5;153(3736):652-4
pubmed: 5939936
Schizophr Res. 2005 May 1;74(2-3):233-52
pubmed: 15722003
Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 15;45(3):963-75
pubmed: 19280708
Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):181-93
pubmed: 16337090
Psychophysiology. 2006 May;43(3):237-52
pubmed: 16805862
Mem Cognit. 2012 Feb;40(2):145-60
pubmed: 22069144
Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):490-500
pubmed: 18466411
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 26;7:796
pubmed: 24324424
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 15;76(2):146-53
pubmed: 24239131
Psychophysiology. 1999 Nov;36(6):667-82
pubmed: 10554581
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 29;95(20):12061-8
pubmed: 9751790
Science. 2004 Jan 9;303(5655):232-5
pubmed: 14716015
Neuropsychology. 2004 Jul;18(3):477-84
pubmed: 15291726
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002 Sep;8(6):847-54
pubmed: 12240749
Trends Neurosci. 1997 Aug;20(8):339-43
pubmed: 9246721
Cogn Process. 2017 Feb;18(1):1-12
pubmed: 27838866
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:321-53
pubmed: 17716091
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 26;8:180
pubmed: 24723879
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):88-97
pubmed: 21319926
Psychophysiology. 2003 Sep;40(5):684-701
pubmed: 14696723
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 20;27(29):6137-57
pubmed: 18816511
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Sep;73(3):186-206
pubmed: 19275917
Schizophr Res. 2005 Feb 1;73(1):5-20
pubmed: 15567071
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):43-52
pubmed: 22080498
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;56(3):267-76
pubmed: 10078505
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Sep;97(5):951-66
pubmed: 22582726
Am Sci. 1969 Winter;57(4):421-57
pubmed: 5360276
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2004 Feb-May;9(1-2):125-45
pubmed: 16571578
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):883-90
pubmed: 9448255
Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):1154-61
pubmed: 21571075
Scand J Psychol. 2009 Dec;50(6):553-60
pubmed: 19930254
Brain Cogn. 2001 Feb;45(1):1-14
pubmed: 11161358