Mixed Methods Analysis of Implementation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) for Major Depressive Disorder in Prisons in a Hybrid Type I Randomized Trial.
Group psychotherapy
Implementation science
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)
Major depressive disorder
Prisons
Journal
Administration and policy in mental health
ISSN: 1573-3289
Titre abrégé: Adm Policy Ment Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8914574
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
5
12
2019
medline:
3
2
2021
entrez:
5
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article describes a mixed methods evaluation of implementation of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in the first fully-powered trial of any treatment for major depressive disorder in an incarcerated population. Assessments in this Hybrid Type I trial included surveys of prison providers and administrators (n = 71), measures of feasibility and acceptability to prison patients (n = 90), and a planned document review (n = 460) to assess potential determinants of implementation. Quantitative and qualitative results indicated that IPT was a good fit for prisoners, and that prisoners and providers were enthusiastic about IPT. Providers were open to feedback, open to learning evidence-based practices, and committed to helping their clients. Limited treatment staff and variable supervision and collegial support may pose implementation challenges. For widespread prison implementation, scalable models for ongoing IPT training and supervision are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31797190
doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00996-1
pii: 10.1007/s10488-019-00996-1
pmc: PMC9187220
mid: NIHMS1545001
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
410-426Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH095230
Pays : United States
Références
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Jun;34(4):371-7
pubmed: 17629441
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Sep;39(5):331-40
pubmed: 20607597
Ment Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;5(2):97-108
pubmed: 12801073
J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Nov;110(4):544-52
pubmed: 11727944
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;166(1):103-9
pubmed: 19047321
Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):52-62
pubmed: 21319484
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):382-407
pubmed: 23975761
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26
pubmed: 22310560
Prison J. 2015 Sep;95(3):330-352
pubmed: 26508805
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Nov;31(5):385-93
pubmed: 18809210
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3117-24
pubmed: 12813117
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Jun;30(4):448-66
pubmed: 20304542
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):971-82; discussion 983
pubmed: 2684085
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):44-53
pubmed: 20967495
Am J Health Promot. 1992 Jan-Feb;6(3):214-24
pubmed: 10148679
Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Nov;51(11):1444-6
pubmed: 11058195
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1999 Jan-Feb;20(1):73-89
pubmed: 10196925
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Mar;35(1-2):84-97
pubmed: 18000750
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Apr;87(4):392-406
pubmed: 30714749
Lancet. 2002 Feb 16;359(9306):545-50
pubmed: 11867106
Am J Addict. 2004 Jan-Feb;13(1):83-101
pubmed: 14766441
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Sep;46(9):1174-83
pubmed: 22694906
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Apr;32(3):225-38
pubmed: 17383548
Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207
pubmed: 10245370
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:266-74
pubmed: 26845030
Behav Sci Law. 2008;26(4):435-55
pubmed: 18683196