Prospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Food Supplement in Increasing Photoprotection and Improving Selective Markers Related to Skin Photo-Ageing.

Antioxidant protection Clinical study Oral supplement Photoprotection Sunscreen Ultraviolet radiation

Journal

Dermatology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8210
Titre abrégé: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101590450

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 04 10 2019
pubmed: 5 12 2019
medline: 5 12 2019
entrez: 5 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Skin exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) can cause oxidative stress, particularly in the absence of adequate protective measures or in individuals with a sensitive skin type. Most commonly, protection from UVR entails the use of topical sunscreens. Sunscreens, however, have various limitations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of an oral food supplement containing a combination of actives with mainly antioxidative properties (vitamins A, C, D3, E, selenium, lycopene, lutein, as well as green tea, polypodium and grape extracts) in the context of photoprotection. Photoprotective efficacy was assessed in a 12-week-long, open, prospective and monocentric clinical study with 30 subjects (27 women and 3 men) having a Fitzpatrick skin type I-III and manifesting clinical ageing signs. The study included several visits (14, 28, 56, and 84 days after starting supplement intake), in which photoprotection was evaluated by the measurement of the minimal erythema dose (MED), while the antioxidant capacity of the skin was assessed through ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and malondialdehyde (MDA) assays. Additionally, several skin parameters (including radiance, elasticity, and moisture) were evaluated. Product evaluation was performed throughout the length of the study by means of a self-assessment questionnaire, and safety was monitored through a self-recording of all observed adverse reactions. The MED levels increased significantly compared to baseline throughout the study visits, reaching an increase of + 8.1% at T84, p < 0.001. FRAP results also indicated a significant increase in the antioxidant capacity of the skin compared to baseline (+ 22.7% at T84, p < 0.001), while the MDA assay showed a significant decrease in MDA concentration compared to baseline (- 6.4% at T84, p < 0.001) which, in line with the FRAP results, indicated enhanced antioxidative protection of the skin. All assessed skin parameters, including radiance (+ 36.1% at T84, p < 0.001), gross elasticity (+ 13.2% at T84, p < 0.001), net elasticity (+ 28.0% at T84, p < 0.001), and moisture (+ 13.8% at T84, p < 0.001) were also significantly improved. The product was well tolerated as no adverse events were attributed by the investigators to the use of the product. Additionally, the global score obtained from the self-assessment questionnaires provided overwhelmingly positive feedback from the study subjects. The food supplement evaluated in this study was effective and well-tolerated by the subjects, demonstrating a beneficial effect in terms of photoprotection, enhancing the antioxidative status of the skin and improving general skin condition. Retrospectively registered 3rd October 2019, ISRCTN18121679.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31797305
doi: 10.1007/s13555-019-00345-y
pii: 10.1007/s13555-019-00345-y
pmc: PMC6994571
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

163-178

Références

J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 Jan;38(1):45-8
pubmed: 9448204
An Bras Dermatol. 2012 Jan-Feb;87(1):52-61
pubmed: 22481651
Clin Dermatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):752-62
pubmed: 25441468
Nutr Cancer. 2017 May-Jun;69(4):521-533
pubmed: 28362118
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jun 29;17(7):
pubmed: 27367679
Int J Cosmet Sci. 1991 Aug;13(4):191-208
pubmed: 19291061
J Nutr. 2003 Jan;133(1):98-101
pubmed: 12514275
DNA Cell Biol. 2017 Nov;36(11):879-882
pubmed: 29064295
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13765-70
pubmed: 16954188
FASEB J. 1989 Jun;3(8):1927-32
pubmed: 2656356
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Nov;96(5):1179S-84S
pubmed: 23053552
Exp Dermatol. 2014 Oct;23 Suppl 1:32-6
pubmed: 25234834
Curr Oncol Rep. 2010 Sep;12(5):319-26
pubmed: 20623386
Photochem Photobiol. 2011 Sep-Oct;87(5):965-77
pubmed: 21749399
Anal Biochem. 1996 Jul 15;239(1):70-6
pubmed: 8660627
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Jun 07;14(6):12222-48
pubmed: 23749111
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Jan;164(1):154-62
pubmed: 20854436
J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Dec;135(12):2971-2981
pubmed: 26288355
Int J Dermatol. 1987 May;26(4):201-5
pubmed: 3298089
Nutrition. 2001 Oct;17(10):839-44
pubmed: 11684391
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2017 Sep;33(5):284-286
pubmed: 28503757
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Jun 26;5:188
pubmed: 29998107
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2003 Apr;25(1-2):45-53
pubmed: 18494882
Dermatoendocrinol. 2016 Oct 19;8(1):e1248325
pubmed: 27942349
Arch Dermatol. 2002 Nov;138(11):1462-70
pubmed: 12437452
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 12;9(8):
pubmed: 28805671
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2014 May;14(2):e157-65
pubmed: 24790736
Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):869-71
pubmed: 3377516
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Oct;137(10):2078-2086
pubmed: 28576736
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018 Feb 22;2018:5895439
pubmed: 29682159
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 29;344(13):975-83
pubmed: 11274625
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Dec;69(6):853.e1-12; quiz 865-6
pubmed: 24238179
Br J Dermatol. 2017 May;176(5):1231-1240
pubmed: 27662341
Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(12):8466-75
pubmed: 22272084
Br J Dermatol. 1999 Feb;140(2):255-8
pubmed: 10233218
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014 Apr-Jun;30(2-3):102-11
pubmed: 24313740
Cell Immunol. 2012 Nov;280(1):36-43
pubmed: 23261827
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jul;77(1):33-41.e1
pubmed: 28341348
Mutat Res. 2010 Nov 28;703(1):18-23
pubmed: 20696268
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 18;9:315-324
pubmed: 27799805
Chem Res Toxicol. 1998 Oct;11(10):1184-94
pubmed: 9778315
Skin Res Technol. 2013 Feb;19(1):e238-42
pubmed: 22650601
Phytother Res. 2004 Nov;18(11):895-9
pubmed: 15597304
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Oct;169 Suppl 3:33-40
pubmed: 24098899
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 07;9:325-332
pubmed: 27785083
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Jun;52(6):937-58; quiz 959-62
pubmed: 15928611
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018 Jan;34(1):50-59
pubmed: 29044724

Auteurs

Corinne Granger (C)

Innovation and Development ISDIN, Barcelona, Spain.

Sonia Aladren (S)

Innovation and Development ISDIN, Barcelona, Spain.

Jesus Delgado (J)

Innovation and Development ISDIN, Barcelona, Spain.

Aurora Garre (A)

Innovation and Development ISDIN, Barcelona, Spain.

Carles Trullas (C)

Innovation and Development ISDIN, Barcelona, Spain. carles.trullas@isdin.com.

Yolanda Gilaberte (Y)

Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain.

Classifications MeSH