Personalising cardiovascular network models in pregnancy: A two-tiered parameter estimation approach.


Journal

International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering
ISSN: 2040-7947
Titre abrégé: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101530293

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
revised: 07 08 2019
received: 01 04 2019
accepted: 07 09 2019
pubmed: 5 12 2019
medline: 26 11 2021
entrez: 5 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Uterine artery Doppler waveforms are often studied to determine whether a patient is at risk of developing pathologies such as pre-eclampsia. Many uterine waveform indices have been developed, which attempt to relate characteristics of the waveform with the physiological adaptation of the maternal cardiovascular system, and are often suggested to be an indicator of increased placenta resistance and arterial stiffness. Doppler waveforms of four patients, two of whom developed pre-eclampsia, are compared with a comprehensive closed-loop model of pregnancy. The closed-loop model has been previously validated but has been extended to include an improved parameter estimation technique that utilises systolic and diastolic blood pressure, cardiac output, heart rate, and pulse wave velocity measurements to adapt model resistances, compliances, blood volume, and the mean vessel areas in the main systemic arteries. The shape of the model-predicted uterine artery velocity waveforms showed good agreement with the characteristics observed in the patient Doppler waveforms. The personalised models obtained now allow a prediction of the uterine pressure waveforms in addition to the uterine velocity. This allows for a more detailed mechanistic analysis of the waveforms, eg, wave intensity analysis, to study existing clinical indices. The findings indicate that to accurately estimate arterial stiffness, both pulse pressure and pulse wave velocities are required. In addition, the results predict that patients who developed pre-eclampsia later in pregnancy have larger vessel areas in the main systemic arteries compared with the two patients who had normal pregnancy outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31799783
doi: 10.1002/cnm.3267
pmc: PMC9286682
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e3267

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S004076/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

Heart. 2016 Apr;102(7):518-26
pubmed: 26794234
Acta Radiol Suppl. 1955;122:1-128
pubmed: 14387801
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2021 Nov;37(11):e3267
pubmed: 31799783
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Jul;79(1):47-50
pubmed: 9643403
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;85(5 Pt 1):760-5
pubmed: 7724109
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 May;39(5):870-81
pubmed: 23453373
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Jan;271(1):53-8
pubmed: 15175886
Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13:30
pubmed: 23308335
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978 Sep;85(9):698-706
pubmed: 698153
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Jun;18(3):383-96
pubmed: 15183134
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jan 15;151(2):191-6
pubmed: 3970084
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;78(6):1073-7
pubmed: 1945210
J Ultrasound. 2015 Mar 18;18(2):201-4
pubmed: 26191112
Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1972;1:177-91
pubmed: 4669123
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Feb;47(2):175-88
pubmed: 19205773
Placenta. 2009 Jun;30(6):473-82
pubmed: 19375795
Angiology. 2016 Apr;67(4):375-83
pubmed: 26251051
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov;155(5):1031-6
pubmed: 2946229
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016 Mar-Apr;27(2):89-94
pubmed: 27213856
Hypertens Res. 2007 Aug;30(8):713-22
pubmed: 17917319
Placenta. 2010 Jan;31(1):44-52
pubmed: 19945160
Semin Perinatol. 1987 Oct;11(4):362-8
pubmed: 3321456
Placenta. 2010 Jan;31(1):37-43
pubmed: 19945159
J Biomech Eng. 1990 Aug;112(3):322-6
pubmed: 2214715
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):78-83
pubmed: 8515930
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;37(5):538-42
pubmed: 21154788
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59371
pubmed: 23544061
Hum Reprod Update. 1997 Sep-Oct;3(5):467-503
pubmed: 9528912
Med Eng Phys. 1997 Jun;19(4):327-35
pubmed: 9302672
Hypertens Res. 2014 Aug;37(8):733-40
pubmed: 24621469
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Jun 12;10(6):e1003667
pubmed: 24921933
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;195(2):464-9
pubmed: 16647682
Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Jun;43(6):1443-60
pubmed: 25832485
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Nov;42(5):972-9
pubmed: 16275456
Eur J Ultrasound. 1998 Apr;7(2):129-43
pubmed: 9614282
J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2011 Jan;2(1):3-10
pubmed: 22442527
Interface Focus. 2015 Apr 6;5(2):20140078
pubmed: 25844150
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2017 Jul;33(7):
pubmed: 27709800
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2019 Aug;18(4):1155-1176
pubmed: 30838498
CMAJ. 2008 Mar 11;178(6):701-11
pubmed: 18332385
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;97(4):515-20
pubmed: 11275020
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;33(3):156-63
pubmed: 23445882
Hum Reprod. 2002 Jan;17(1):190-4
pubmed: 11756386
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;197(2):162.e1-6
pubmed: 17689635
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1045-50
pubmed: 21962953
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Sep;47:55-63
pubmed: 28694109
BJOG. 2000 Feb;107(2):196-208
pubmed: 10688503
Physiology (Bethesda). 2009 Feb;24:58-71
pubmed: 19196652
Reprod Sci. 2009 Nov;16(11):1091-6
pubmed: 19657141
Reproduction. 2010 Dec;140(6):803-13
pubmed: 20837731
J Prenat Med. 2010 Oct;4(4):59-62
pubmed: 22439063
Sci Rep. 2014 Jan 21;4:3785
pubmed: 24445576
Hypertension. 2008 Apr;51(4):1047-51
pubmed: 18259025
Crit Ultrasound J. 2018 Jan 16;10(1):2
pubmed: 29340797
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;16(7):635-9
pubmed: 11169370
PLoS One. 2009 Jul 03;4(7):e6134
pubmed: 19578538
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;23(1):50-5
pubmed: 14971000
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jul;78(1):152-8
pubmed: 2047059
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Sep;29(9):827-37
pubmed: 27161291
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Oct;60(10):2079-88
pubmed: 24081256
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jun;19(6):515-9
pubmed: 25197292
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;49(1):54-60
pubmed: 26990029
J Perinat Med. 2006;34(6):447-58
pubmed: 17140293
Placenta. 2018 Jun;66:74-81
pubmed: 29884305
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Aug;92(8):960-6
pubmed: 23590597
Placenta. 2017 Sep;57:9-12
pubmed: 28864024
BJOG. 2005 Jun;112(6):703-9
pubmed: 15924523
J Biomed Opt. 2012 Jul;17(7):070504
pubmed: 22894460
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;26(5):490-4
pubmed: 16184511

Auteurs

Jason Carson (J)

Zienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Data Science Building, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
HDR UK Wales and Northern Ireland, Health Data Research UK, London, UK.

Lynne Warrander (L)

Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Edward Johnstone (E)

Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Raoul van Loon (R)

Zienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH