Secukinumab efficacy on resolution of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies.


Journal

Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 12 2019
Historique:
received: 31 05 2019
accepted: 08 11 2019
entrez: 6 12 2019
pubmed: 6 12 2019
medline: 10 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Enthesitis is one of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. Patients with enthesitis are associated with worse outcomes than those without enthesitis. The effect of secukinumab on the resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA was explored using pooled data from the FUTURE 2 and 3 studies. Assessments of enthesitis through week 104 used the Leeds Enthesitis Index. These post hoc analyses included resolution of enthesitis count (EC = 0), median time to first resolution of enthesitis (Kaplan-Meϊer estimate), and shift analysis (as observed) of baseline EC (1, 2, or 3-6) to full resolution (FR), stable (similar or reduction of EC), or worse (EC > baseline). Efficacy outcomes (ACR, PASI, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and DAS28-CRP) were assessed in patients with or without baseline enthesitis. Results are reported for secukinumab 300 and 150 mg in the overall population and by prior TNFi treatment. A total of 65% (466/712) of patients had baseline enthesitis. In the overall population, FR was achieved as early as week 16 in 65% (300 mg) and 56% (150 mg) versus 44% (placebo) patients, with further improvements to 91% (300 mg) and 88% (150 mg) at week 104. The majority (89%) of patients without enthesitis at baseline maintained this status at week 104. Median days to resolution of EC were shorter with secukinumab 300 and 150 mg versus placebo (57 and 85 vs 167 days, respectively). In patients with EC of 1 or 2, shift analysis from baseline to week 24 showed that more patients achieved FR with secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, whereas no difference between secukinumab and placebo was shown in the more severe patients with EC of 3-6. Increases in proportions of patients with FR were observed with secukinumab irrespective of the severity of EC from baseline to week 104. Improvements in efficacy outcomes were similar in patients with or without enthesitis treated with secukinumab 300 mg. Secukinumab provided early and sustained resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA over 2 years. Secukinumab 300 mg provided higher resolution than 150 mg in patients with more severe baseline EC and showed similar overall efficacy in patients with or without enthesitis. FUTURE 2: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01752634 (date of study registration: December 19, 2012), and EudraCT, 2012-004439-22 (date of study registration: December 12, 2012) FUTURE 3: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01989468 (date of study registration: November 21, 2013), and EudraCT, 2013-004002-25 (date of study registration: December 17, 2013).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Enthesitis is one of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. Patients with enthesitis are associated with worse outcomes than those without enthesitis. The effect of secukinumab on the resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA was explored using pooled data from the FUTURE 2 and 3 studies.
METHOD
Assessments of enthesitis through week 104 used the Leeds Enthesitis Index. These post hoc analyses included resolution of enthesitis count (EC = 0), median time to first resolution of enthesitis (Kaplan-Meϊer estimate), and shift analysis (as observed) of baseline EC (1, 2, or 3-6) to full resolution (FR), stable (similar or reduction of EC), or worse (EC > baseline). Efficacy outcomes (ACR, PASI, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and DAS28-CRP) were assessed in patients with or without baseline enthesitis. Results are reported for secukinumab 300 and 150 mg in the overall population and by prior TNFi treatment.
RESULTS
A total of 65% (466/712) of patients had baseline enthesitis. In the overall population, FR was achieved as early as week 16 in 65% (300 mg) and 56% (150 mg) versus 44% (placebo) patients, with further improvements to 91% (300 mg) and 88% (150 mg) at week 104. The majority (89%) of patients without enthesitis at baseline maintained this status at week 104. Median days to resolution of EC were shorter with secukinumab 300 and 150 mg versus placebo (57 and 85 vs 167 days, respectively). In patients with EC of 1 or 2, shift analysis from baseline to week 24 showed that more patients achieved FR with secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, whereas no difference between secukinumab and placebo was shown in the more severe patients with EC of 3-6. Increases in proportions of patients with FR were observed with secukinumab irrespective of the severity of EC from baseline to week 104. Improvements in efficacy outcomes were similar in patients with or without enthesitis treated with secukinumab 300 mg.
CONCLUSION
Secukinumab provided early and sustained resolution of enthesitis in patients with PsA over 2 years. Secukinumab 300 mg provided higher resolution than 150 mg in patients with more severe baseline EC and showed similar overall efficacy in patients with or without enthesitis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
FUTURE 2: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01752634 (date of study registration: December 19, 2012), and EudraCT, 2012-004439-22 (date of study registration: December 12, 2012) FUTURE 3: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01989468 (date of study registration: November 21, 2013), and EudraCT, 2013-004002-25 (date of study registration: December 17, 2013).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31801620
doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2055-z
pii: 10.1186/s13075-019-2055-z
pmc: PMC6894120
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Antirheumatic Agents 0
secukinumab DLG4EML025

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01752634', 'NCT01989468']
EudraCT
['2012-004439-22', '2013-004002-25']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

266

Références

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;69(11):2151-2161
pubmed: 28805045
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Apr;67(4):914-23
pubmed: 25545240
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Feb;48(4):632-637
pubmed: 30037432
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Nov;78(11):1559-1565
pubmed: 31530557
Lancet. 2015 Sep 19;386(9999):1137-46
pubmed: 26135703
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jan;71(1):2-29
pubmed: 30499259
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Sep-Oct;33(5 Suppl 93):S36-9
pubmed: 26472070
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Apr;76(4):673-680
pubmed: 27613807
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):79-87
pubmed: 27553214
Clin Med (Lond). 2017 Feb;17(1):65-70
pubmed: 28148584
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Sep;69(9):1816-1822
pubmed: 28511289
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Aug;64(8):1150-7
pubmed: 15677701
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Nov;69(11):1685-1691
pubmed: 27998023
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May 15;59(5):686-91
pubmed: 18438903
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Dec;43(3):325-34
pubmed: 23731532
RMD Open. 2017 Jul 18;3(1):e000415
pubmed: 29225916
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;27(2):111-7
pubmed: 25603036
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):48-55
pubmed: 23942868
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 21;13(12):731-741
pubmed: 29158573
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Nov 1;56(11):1993-2003
pubmed: 28968735
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1329-39
pubmed: 26422723
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Aug;48(1):35-43
pubmed: 29429762
J Rheumatol. 2016 May;43(5):918-23
pubmed: 26980581
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 May;68(5):1060-71
pubmed: 26749174
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Mar 15;20(1):47
pubmed: 29544534
J Rheumatol. 2018 Nov;45(11):1526-1531
pubmed: 29961685
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Nov;69(11):1692-1699
pubmed: 28376239
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr;60(4):976-86
pubmed: 19333944
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jan 29;21(1):38
pubmed: 30696483
Joint Bone Spine. 2012 May;79(3):324-5
pubmed: 22119348
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jun;77(6):890-897
pubmed: 29550766
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S64-85
pubmed: 22588772
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):312-22
pubmed: 26473401
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Sep;23 Suppl 1:9-13
pubmed: 19686380

Auteurs

Laura C Coates (LC)

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. laura.coates@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.

Johan K Wallman (JK)

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Dennis McGonagle (D)

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Georg A Schett (GA)

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Iain B McInnes (IB)

University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Philip J Mease (PJ)

Swedish Medical Centre and University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Lawrence Rasouliyan (L)

RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain.

Erhard Quebe-Fehling (E)

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Darren L Asquith (DL)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd., Camberley, UK.

Andreas E R Fasth (AER)

Novartis Sverige AB, Täby, Sweden.

Luminita Pricop (L)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, USA.

Corine Gaillez (C)

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH