Usefulness of the satiety quotient in a clinical pediatric obesity context.
Journal
European journal of clinical nutrition
ISSN: 1476-5640
Titre abrégé: Eur J Clin Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8804070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
05
10
2019
accepted:
21
11
2019
revised:
19
11
2019
pubmed:
6
12
2019
medline:
13
5
2021
entrez:
6
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While the satiety quotient (SQ) is increasingly used in pediatric populations, the present study assessed its reliability and reproducibility in adolescents with obesity. Sixty-eight adolescents with obesity were enrolled. Anthropometric measurements and body composition (DXA) were assessed. They randomly completed two experimental sessions: (i) condition with a standardized breakfast used to calculate SQ (C1); (ii) condition with the same breakfast and ad libitum lunch and dinner buffet meals (C2). Appetite feelings were assessed at regular interval (visual analog scales). SQ for hunger (SQH), satiety (SQS), prospective food consumption (SQP), and desire to eat (SQD) were calculated using the breakfast. SQH, SQD, and SQ mean did not differ between conditions (p = 0.41, 0.57, and 0.74, respectively) whereas SQS and SQP were significantly different between conditions (p = 0.007 and 0.005). None of the SQ was correlated with body weight (BW), BMI, or FM. There was no significant correlation between the SQ and the adolescent's ad libitum energy intake (lunch, dinner, and total). No differences were observed between adolescents with a low and high phenotype for BW, BMI, and FM% (p = 0.26, 0.30, and 0.83); total energy (p = 0.21); total protein intake (p = 0.28); total fat intake (p = 0.24) and total carbohydrate intake (p = 0.44). Thirty percent of the adolescents showed different satiety phenotype (low vs. high) between C1 and C2. While the SQ is a reliable indicator in adults, it must be used with caution in adolescents with obesity due to its lack of association with anthropometric measurements, body composition, and energy and macronutrient intakes in this population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
While the satiety quotient (SQ) is increasingly used in pediatric populations, the present study assessed its reliability and reproducibility in adolescents with obesity.
METHODS
Sixty-eight adolescents with obesity were enrolled. Anthropometric measurements and body composition (DXA) were assessed. They randomly completed two experimental sessions: (i) condition with a standardized breakfast used to calculate SQ (C1); (ii) condition with the same breakfast and ad libitum lunch and dinner buffet meals (C2). Appetite feelings were assessed at regular interval (visual analog scales).
RESULTS
SQ for hunger (SQH), satiety (SQS), prospective food consumption (SQP), and desire to eat (SQD) were calculated using the breakfast. SQH, SQD, and SQ mean did not differ between conditions (p = 0.41, 0.57, and 0.74, respectively) whereas SQS and SQP were significantly different between conditions (p = 0.007 and 0.005). None of the SQ was correlated with body weight (BW), BMI, or FM. There was no significant correlation between the SQ and the adolescent's ad libitum energy intake (lunch, dinner, and total). No differences were observed between adolescents with a low and high phenotype for BW, BMI, and FM% (p = 0.26, 0.30, and 0.83); total energy (p = 0.21); total protein intake (p = 0.28); total fat intake (p = 0.24) and total carbohydrate intake (p = 0.44). Thirty percent of the adolescents showed different satiety phenotype (low vs. high) between C1 and C2.
CONCLUSIONS
While the SQ is a reliable indicator in adults, it must be used with caution in adolescents with obesity due to its lack of association with anthropometric measurements, body composition, and energy and macronutrient intakes in this population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31801982
doi: 10.1038/s41430-019-0540-8
pii: 10.1038/s41430-019-0540-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
930-937Références
Blundell JE, Gibbons C, Caudwell P, Finlayson G, Hopkins M. Appetite control and energy balance: impact of exercise. Obes Rev. 2015;16:67–76.
doi: 10.1111/obr.12257
Hopkins M, Duarte C, Beaulieu K, Finlayson G, Gibbons C, Johnstone AM, et al. Activity energy expenditure is an independent predictor of energy intake in humans. Int J Obes. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0308-6.
doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0308-6.
Harris RBS, editor. Appetite and food intake: central control. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2017. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK453148/ . Accessed 21 May 2019.
Green SM, Delargy HJ, Joanes D, Blundell JE. A satiety quotient: a formulation to assess the satiating effect of food. Appetite. 1997;29:291–304.
doi: 10.1006/appe.1997.0096
Arguin H, Gagnon-Sweeney M, Pigeon É, Tremblay A. Functional food and satiety. Impact of a satiating context effect on appetite control of non-obese men. Appetite. 2012;58:354–363.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.11.007
Beaulieu K, Hopkins M, Blundell J, Finlayson G. Impact of physical activity level and dietary fat content on passive overconsumption of energy in non-obese adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:14.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0473-3
Drapeau V, Blundell J, Therrien F, Lawton C, Richard D, Tremblay A. Appetite sensations as a marker of overall intake. Br J Nutr. 2005;93:273–280.
doi: 10.1079/BJN20041312
Dubé M-C, Tremblay A, Lavoie C, John Weisnagel S. Effect of exercise on food consumption and appetite sensations in subjects with diabetes. Appetite. 2013;71:403–410.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.023
McNeil J, Forest G, Hintze LJ, Brunet J-F, Finlayson G, Blundell JE, et al. The effects of partial sleep restriction and altered sleep timing on appetite and food reward. Appetite. 2017;109:48–56.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.020
Salama M, Drapeau V, Tremblay A, Pérusse-Lachance É. The impact of a mental work on food preferences, eating behavior traits and satiety efficiency. Physiol Behav. 2016;154:191–195.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.11.015
Arguin H, Tremblay A, Blundell JE, Després J-P, Richard D, Lamarche B, et al. Impact of a non-restrictive satiating diet on anthropometrics, satiety responsiveness and eating behaviour traits in obese men displaying a high or a low satiety phenotype. Br J Nutr. 2017;118:750–760.
doi: 10.1017/S0007114517002549
Drapeau V, Blundell J, Gallant AR, Arguin H, Després J-P, Lamarche B, et al. Behavioural and metabolic characterisation of the low satiety phenotype. Appetite. 2013;70:67–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.05.022
Drapeau V, Jacob R, Panahi S, Tremblay A. Effect of energy restriction on eating behavior traits and psychobehavioral factors in the low satiety phenotype. Nutrients. 2019; 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020245 .
Drapeau V, King N, Hetherington M, Doucet E, Blundell J, Tremblay A. Appetite sensations and satiety quotient: predictors of energy intake and weight loss. Appetite. 2007;48:159–166.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.08.002
McNeil J, Prud’homme D, Strychar I, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Brochu M, Lavoie J-M, et al. Satiety quotient linked to food intake and changes in anthropometry during menopause: a MONET Study. Climacteric J Int Menopause Soc. 2014;17:449–455.
doi: 10.3109/13697137.2014.895320
Drapeau V, Hetherington M, Tremblay A. Impact of eating and lifestyle behaviors on body weight: beyond energy value. In: Preedy VR, Watson RR, Martin CR, editors. Handbook of behavior, food and nutrition. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011, p. 693–706.
Dalton M, Hollingworth S, Blundell J, Finlayson G. Weak satiety responsiveness is a reliable trait associated with hedonic risk factors for overeating among women. Nutrients. 2015;7:7421–7436.
doi: 10.3390/nu7095345
Albert M-H, Drapeau V, Mathieu M-E. Timing of moderate-to-vigorous exercise and its impact on subsequent energy intake in young males. Physiol Behav. 2015;151:557–562.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.030
Fillon A, Mathieu M-E, Masurier J, Roche J, Miguet M, Khammassi M et al. Effect of exercise-meal timing on energy intake, appetite and food reward in adolescents with obesity: the TIMEX study. Under revision.
Thivel D, Roche J, Miguet M, Fillon A, Khammassi M, Finlayson G, et al. Post-exercise energy replacement does not reduce subsequent appetite and energy intake in adolescents with obesity. Obes Facts. 2019;12:120–122.
Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. Brit Med J. 2000;320:1240.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240
Bryant EJ, Thivel D, Chaput J-P, Drapeau V, Blundell JE, King NA. Development and validation of the Child Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (CTFEQr17). Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:2558–2567.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001210
Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The Three-factor Eating Questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:71–83.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8
Yabsley J-L, Gunnell KE, Bryant EJ, Drapeau V, Thivel D, Adamo KB et al. Validation of a child version of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire in a Canadian sample: a psychometric tool for the evaluation of eating behaviour. Public Health Nutr. 2018;27:1–13.
Thivel D, Genin PM, Mathieu M-E, Pereira B, Metz L. Reproducibility of an in-laboratory test meal to assess ad libitum energy intake in adolescents with obesity. Appetite. 2016;105:129–133.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.028
Barkeling B, King NA, Näslund E, Blundell JE. Characterization of obese individuals who claim to detect no relationship between their eating pattern and sensations of hunger or fullness. Int J Obes. 2007;31:435–439.
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803449
Tamam S, Bellissimo N, Patel BP, Thomas SG, Anderson GH. Overweight and obese boys reduce food intake in response to a glucose drink but fail to increase intake in response to exercise of short duration. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:520–529.
doi: 10.1139/h2012-038