The Thin White Line: Adaptation Suggests a Common Neural Mechanism for Judgments of Asian and Caucasian Body Size.
body image
body perception
body size
cross-cultural
visual adaptation
visual aftereffects
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
30
05
2019
accepted:
25
10
2019
entrez:
6
12
2019
pubmed:
6
12
2019
medline:
6
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Visual adaptation has been proposed as a mechanism linking viewing images of thin women's bodies with body size and shape misperception (BSSM). Non-Caucasian populations appear less susceptible to BSSM, possibly because adaptation to thin Caucasian bodies in Western media may not fully transfer to own-race bodies. Experiment 1 used a cross-adaptation paradigm to examine the transfer of body size aftereffects across races. Large aftereffects were found in the predicted directions for all conditions. The strength of aftereffects was statistically equivalent when the race of test stimuli was congruent vs. incongruent with the race of adaptation stimuli, suggesting complete transfer of aftereffects across races. Experiment 2 used a contingent-adaptation paradigm, finding that simultaneous adaptation to wide Asian and narrow Caucasian women's bodies (or vice versa) results in no significant aftereffects for either congruent or incongruent conditions and statistically equivalent results for each. Equal and opposite adaptation effects may therefore transfer completely across races, canceling each other out. This suggests that body size is encoded by a race-general neural mechanism. Unexpectedly, Asian observers showed reduced body size aftereffects compared to Caucasian observers, regardless of the race of stimulus bodies, perhaps helping to explain why Asian populations appear less susceptible to BSSM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31803097
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02532
pmc: PMC6872630
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2532Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Gould-Fensom, Tan, Brooks, Mond, Stevenson and Stephen.
Références
Br J Psychol. 2016 Nov;107(4):752-767
pubmed: 26910312
Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Apr;30(4):644-51
pubmed: 16151414
J Vis. 2013 Aug 22;13(10):
pubmed: 23970436
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 May;8(4):355-362
pubmed: 28736600
Singapore Med J. 2009 Mar;50(3):303-11
pubmed: 19352576
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Jul;38(7):988-94
pubmed: 24722544
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jul 15;10:334
pubmed: 27471447
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 16;7(1):8438
pubmed: 28814743
Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 18;13:1100
pubmed: 31680834
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016 Dec;40(6):518-522
pubmed: 27372301
Int J Eat Disord. 2002 Jan;31(1):1-16
pubmed: 11835293
Perception. 2016 Jul;45(7):725-38
pubmed: 26921409
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48691
pubmed: 23144929
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jul;9(7):961-8
pubmed: 23677488
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e86302
pubmed: 24466014
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 May;38(5):663-7
pubmed: 23949613
Vision Res. 2011 Aug 15;51(16):1811-9
pubmed: 21704059
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 May 9;5(5):171387
pubmed: 29892352
Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Aug;35(8):1063-70
pubmed: 21042327
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Oct 11;170(18):1695-7
pubmed: 20937931
J Int Med Res. 2017 Dec;45(6):2001-2008
pubmed: 29076380
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e3022
pubmed: 18714387
Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):105-10
pubmed: 20937298
Infancy. 2007 Jul;12(1):95-104
pubmed: 33412731
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 10;7:40392
pubmed: 28071712
Curr Biol. 2009 Jan 13;19(1):R11-4
pubmed: 19138580
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1537-47
pubmed: 17707364