Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints.
clinical assessments
inertial measurement units
kinematics
motion analysis
optoelectronic motion capture
range of motion
wrist
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2019
01 Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
23
10
2019
revised:
14
11
2019
accepted:
27
11
2019
entrez:
7
12
2019
pubmed:
7
12
2019
medline:
28
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aims to compare a new inertial measurement unit based system with the highly accurate but complex laboratory gold standard, an optoelectronic motion capture system. Inertial measurement units are sensors based on accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Ten healthy subjects were recorded while performing flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation movements of their right wrist using inertial sensors and skin markers. Maximum range of motion during these trials and mean absolute difference between the systems were calculated. A difference of 10° ± 5° for flexion-extension and 2° ± 1° for radial-ulnar deviation was found between the two systems with absolute range of motion values of 126° and 50° in the respective axes. A Wilcoxon rank sum test resulted in a no statistical differences between the systems with
Identifiants
pubmed: 31805699
pii: s19235297
doi: 10.3390/s19235297
pmc: PMC6929166
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : ministry of science, innovation and universities - spain
ID : RTI2018-095232-B-C21
Références
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 19;8(11):e79945
pubmed: 24260324
J Biomech. 2007;40(1):78-85
pubmed: 16455089
J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):981-992
pubmed: 15844264
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006 Jul;53(7):1385-93
pubmed: 16830942
Gait Posture. 2017 May;54:80-86
pubmed: 28279850
Physiother Theory Pract. 2009 Feb;25(2):145-64
pubmed: 19212902
Hum Factors. 2005 Spring;47(1):77-91
pubmed: 15960088
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18(1):5-7
pubmed: 3715428
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1033-9
pubmed: 16980142
Am J Occup Ther. 1990 Apr;44(4):342-8
pubmed: 2330964
Phys Ther. 1988 Feb;68(2):214-8
pubmed: 3340659
Gait Posture. 2005 Feb;21(2):212-25
pubmed: 15639400
Ergonomics. 2013;56(2):314-26
pubmed: 23231730
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Jul 31;15(8):18813-33
pubmed: 26263993
J Biomech. 2004 Mar;37(3):349-56
pubmed: 14757454
J Biomech. 2014 Aug 22;47(11):2590-7
pubmed: 24998990
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jun;27(6):1529-38
pubmed: 22990570
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jun 10;14(1):173
pubmed: 31182129
Ergonomics. 2016 Apr;59(4):591-602
pubmed: 26256753
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1995 Jun;10(4):171-178
pubmed: 11415549
Phys Ther Rev. 2010 Dec;15(6):462-473
pubmed: 23565045
J Biomech. 1993 Dec;26(12):1473-7
pubmed: 8308052
Med Eng Phys. 2015 Jul;37(7):698-704
pubmed: 25937613
J Biomech Eng. 1983 May;105(2):136-44
pubmed: 6865355
Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(12):10733-51
pubmed: 22163496
J Biomech. 2019 Feb 14;84:81-86
pubmed: 30585155
J Hand Surg Am. 2001 Nov;26(6):1030-5
pubmed: 11721246