Dentin tubule obturation of a bioglass-based dentin desensitizer under repeated exposure to lactid acid and brushing.
Bioglass
Dentin sensitivity
Desensitizer
Electron microscopy
Hypersensitivity
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 12 2019
05 12 2019
Historique:
received:
22
07
2019
accepted:
19
11
2019
entrez:
7
12
2019
pubmed:
7
12
2019
medline:
10
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dentin hypersensitivity is a frequent finding especially in periodontitis patients. Conventional treatment aims for obstruction of dentin tubules by disabling liquid and osmotic fluctuation to and from the pulpal chamber. A novel bioglass-based desensitizer was shown to obstruct tubules and to resist periodic exposure to lactic acid. Whether this obstruction is resistant to brushing had not been tested so far. Accordingly, the present study aimed to assess dentin tubule obstruction after repeated acid exposure and brushing. Sixty dentin discs were cleaned with 17% EDTA, mounted into a pulp fluid simulator and randomly divided into 3 groups: No surface treatment in Group A, Seal&Protect® in group B and DentinoCer in group C. Discs were exposed to 0.1 M non-saturated lactic acid thrice and standardized brushing twice a day for 12 days. At baseline and after 2, 4 and 12 d samples were removed from the setting and prepared for top-view SEM analysis to assess tubule obstruction using the Olley score. Discs were then vertically cut and the section surface morphologically assessed using backscatter imaging. For both vertical and sectional surfaces EDX analysis was used to characterize the surface composition in the tubular and inter-tubular area. Group A showed clean tubular lumina at all time points. From day 2 onwards dentin showed exposed collagen fibers. Group 2 initially showed a complete surface coverage that flattened out during treatment without ever exposing tubules. At baseline, samples of Group C displayed a complete homogeneous coverage. From day 2 on tubules entrances with obstructed lumen became visible. While on day 4 and 12 the dentin surface exposed collagen fibers the lumina remained closed. EDX analysis of the vertical and horizontal views showed that P and Ca were predominant elements in both the inter- and tubular dentin while Si peaks were found in the tubule plugs. While group B displayed a packed layer on the surface during the whole investigation time group C samples lost their superficial layer within 48 h. Tubule plugs containing considerable Si proportions indicated previous presence of DentinoCer, while high Ca and P proportions suggest obturation by dentin-like material.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Dentin hypersensitivity is a frequent finding especially in periodontitis patients. Conventional treatment aims for obstruction of dentin tubules by disabling liquid and osmotic fluctuation to and from the pulpal chamber. A novel bioglass-based desensitizer was shown to obstruct tubules and to resist periodic exposure to lactic acid. Whether this obstruction is resistant to brushing had not been tested so far. Accordingly, the present study aimed to assess dentin tubule obstruction after repeated acid exposure and brushing.
METHODS
Sixty dentin discs were cleaned with 17% EDTA, mounted into a pulp fluid simulator and randomly divided into 3 groups: No surface treatment in Group A, Seal&Protect® in group B and DentinoCer in group C. Discs were exposed to 0.1 M non-saturated lactic acid thrice and standardized brushing twice a day for 12 days. At baseline and after 2, 4 and 12 d samples were removed from the setting and prepared for top-view SEM analysis to assess tubule obstruction using the Olley score. Discs were then vertically cut and the section surface morphologically assessed using backscatter imaging. For both vertical and sectional surfaces EDX analysis was used to characterize the surface composition in the tubular and inter-tubular area.
RESULTS
Group A showed clean tubular lumina at all time points. From day 2 onwards dentin showed exposed collagen fibers. Group 2 initially showed a complete surface coverage that flattened out during treatment without ever exposing tubules. At baseline, samples of Group C displayed a complete homogeneous coverage. From day 2 on tubules entrances with obstructed lumen became visible. While on day 4 and 12 the dentin surface exposed collagen fibers the lumina remained closed. EDX analysis of the vertical and horizontal views showed that P and Ca were predominant elements in both the inter- and tubular dentin while Si peaks were found in the tubule plugs.
CONCLUSION
While group B displayed a packed layer on the surface during the whole investigation time group C samples lost their superficial layer within 48 h. Tubule plugs containing considerable Si proportions indicated previous presence of DentinoCer, while high Ca and P proportions suggest obturation by dentin-like material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31805922
doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0962-7
pii: 10.1186/s12903-019-0962-7
pmc: PMC6896668
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Bioglass
0
Dentin Desensitizing Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
274Références
J Funct Biomater. 2018 Mar 16;9(1):null
pubmed: 29547544
Dent Mater. 2013 Apr;29(4):357-64
pubmed: 23347789
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1:S55-9
pubmed: 23274415
Dent Mater. 2014 Mar;30(3):314-20
pubmed: 24433821
J Dent Res. 2011 Feb;90(2):246-50
pubmed: 21084716
Dent Mater. 2019 May;35(5):772-779
pubmed: 30853209
J Dent. 2013 Oct;41(10):841-51
pubmed: 23911597
J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1007-13
pubmed: 24004965
Acta Odontol Scand. 2008 Aug;66(4):231-5
pubmed: 18622830
J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Oct;29(10):896-900
pubmed: 12445221
J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:173-7; discussion 195-6
pubmed: 12787217
Dent Mater. 2017 Jun;33(6):743-751
pubmed: 28465067
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:141427
pubmed: 24205501
Biomaterials. 2001 Jan;22(2):175-85
pubmed: 11101161
J Dent Res. 2004 Mar;83(3):222-6
pubmed: 14981123
J Dent. 2010 Jun;38(6):509-16
pubmed: 20307624
J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Nov;24(11):808-13
pubmed: 9402502
J Dent. 2018 Apr;71:1-8
pubmed: 29262305
J Clin Dent. 2009;20(4):115-22
pubmed: 19831164
J Dent Res. 2006 Apr;85(4):306-12
pubmed: 16567549
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):193
pubmed: 30463552
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Dec;7(4):246-52
pubmed: 17164070
J Dent Res. 2006 Oct;85(10):870-7
pubmed: 16998124
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 21;12(2):e0172060
pubmed: 28222156
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1:S3-8
pubmed: 23224064
Arch Oral Biol. 2000 May;45(5):355-61
pubmed: 10739856
Arch Oral Biol. 2010 Mar;55(3):223-8
pubmed: 20083245
J Orthod Sci. 2019 Feb 20;8:5
pubmed: 31001497
J Dent. 2012 Jul;40(7):585-93
pubmed: 22484377
Acta Biomater. 2010 Aug;6(8):2874-88
pubmed: 20152946
Arch Oral Biol. 2005 Jun;50(6):541-52
pubmed: 15848147
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):815-22
pubmed: 22791283
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 May;35(5):390-4
pubmed: 18405276
Aust Dent J. 2015 Sep;60(3):336-42
pubmed: 26211687
Am J Dent. 2005 Aug;18(4):291-5
pubmed: 16296439
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Nov;37(11):973-80
pubmed: 20860720
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 Nov;19(11):1088-90, 1092, 1094 passim
pubmed: 10202463
Dent Update. 1992 Dec;19(10):407-8, 410-2
pubmed: 1303354
Dent Mater. 2015 Aug;31(8):916-27
pubmed: 26026799
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Dec;18(9):2077-86
pubmed: 24504375
J Am Dent Assoc. 1992 Apr;123(4):57-61
pubmed: 1597627
J Conserv Dent. 2016 May-Jun;19(3):239-44
pubmed: 27217637
J Dent. 2012 May;40(5):416-22
pubmed: 22326565
J Biomater Appl. 2019 Jan;33(6):834-853
pubmed: 30458663
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S256-302
pubmed: 25495777
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Nov 30;3:194
pubmed: 26649290