Effectiveness of physical activity promotion and exercise referral in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.


Journal

Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 12 2019
Historique:
received: 05 06 2019
accepted: 14 10 2019
entrez: 7 12 2019
pubmed: 7 12 2019
medline: 17 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Physical inactivity is the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality. Reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity are efficacious for improving many physical and mental health conditions including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and depression. Reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity can also be effective at reducing obesity; however, sedentary behaviour and reduced physical activity are also associated with mortality independently. Despite this, most adults in the UK do not currently meet the UK Chief Medical Officers' guidelines for weekly physical activity. As most adults visit their general practitioner at least once a year, the primary care consultation provides a unique opportunity to deliver exercise referral or physical activity promotion interventions. This is a protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials for the effectiveness of physical activity promotion and referral in primary care. A comprehensive literature search of Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) will be conducted for studies with a minimum follow-up of 12 months that report physical activity as an outcome measure (by either self-report or objective measures) including an intention to treat analysis. The authors will screen papers, first by title and abstract and then by full text, independently assess studies for inclusion, appraise risk of bias and extract data. The quality of the evidence will be assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach. The primary outcome will be participation in physical activity at 12 months. Pooled effects will be calculated using random effects models. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and for presentation at UK national primary care conferences. This systematic review and meta-analyses will summarise the evidence for the effectiveness of physical activity promotion and referral as interventions for improving physical activity, as well as whether studies using objective measures of physical activity have similar effects to those studies using self-report measures. This knowledge has importance for primary care clinicians, patients and, given the focus of the recent NHS long-term plan on preventive medicine, those making policy decisions. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO the international prospective register of systematic reviews, ID CRD42019130831.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Physical inactivity is the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality. Reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity are efficacious for improving many physical and mental health conditions including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and depression. Reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity can also be effective at reducing obesity; however, sedentary behaviour and reduced physical activity are also associated with mortality independently. Despite this, most adults in the UK do not currently meet the UK Chief Medical Officers' guidelines for weekly physical activity. As most adults visit their general practitioner at least once a year, the primary care consultation provides a unique opportunity to deliver exercise referral or physical activity promotion interventions. This is a protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials for the effectiveness of physical activity promotion and referral in primary care.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) will be conducted for studies with a minimum follow-up of 12 months that report physical activity as an outcome measure (by either self-report or objective measures) including an intention to treat analysis. The authors will screen papers, first by title and abstract and then by full text, independently assess studies for inclusion, appraise risk of bias and extract data. The quality of the evidence will be assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach. The primary outcome will be participation in physical activity at 12 months. Pooled effects will be calculated using random effects models. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and for presentation at UK national primary care conferences.
DISCUSSION
This systematic review and meta-analyses will summarise the evidence for the effectiveness of physical activity promotion and referral as interventions for improving physical activity, as well as whether studies using objective measures of physical activity have similar effects to those studies using self-report measures. This knowledge has importance for primary care clinicians, patients and, given the focus of the recent NHS long-term plan on preventive medicine, those making policy decisions.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
The protocol is registered with PROSPERO the international prospective register of systematic reviews, ID CRD42019130831.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31806028
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1198-y
pii: 10.1186/s13643-019-1198-y
pmc: PMC6894292
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

303

Références

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Jan 15;5:6
pubmed: 30675373
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Sports Med. 2010 Jul 1;40(7):565-600
pubmed: 20545381
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Oct;53(4):490-499
pubmed: 28818417
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 5;8(1):303
pubmed: 31806028
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;32(5):541-556
pubmed: 28708630
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Feb 8;15(1):15
pubmed: 29422051
PLoS Med. 2015 Feb 17;12(2):e1001783
pubmed: 25689364
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Aug;66(8):745-53
pubmed: 22577180
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(60):1-110
pubmed: 26222987
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Dec 29;15:218
pubmed: 25543688
Addiction. 2012 Jun;107(6):1066-73
pubmed: 22175545
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Dec;15(44):i-xii, 1-254
pubmed: 22182828
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;51(20):1459-1465
pubmed: 28500079
BMJ. 2012 Mar 26;344:e1389
pubmed: 22451477
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD004148
pubmed: 17443541
PLoS One. 2015 May 04;10(5):e0125004
pubmed: 25938509
Obes Rev. 2018 Apr;19(4):518-528
pubmed: 29363253
Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(5):317-23
pubmed: 22186174
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD000165
pubmed: 23728631
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94
pubmed: 21195583

Auteurs

Jean-Pierre Laake (JP)

Unit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. j.laake@warwick.ac.uk.

Joanna Fleming (J)

Unit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH