Real-World Data: Ranibizumab Treatment For Retinal Vein Occlusion In The OCEAN Study.
RVO
anti-VEGF
macular edema
ranibizumab
real-world
retinal vein occlusion
Journal
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
19
03
2019
accepted:
12
09
2019
entrez:
7
12
2019
pubmed:
7
12
2019
medline:
7
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The non-interventional OCEAN study (NCT02194803) evaluated frequency and monitoring of ranibizumab injections for retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine practice in Germany. RVO patients (including branch and central RVO (BRVO/CRVO)) receiving ranibizumab were included. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, imaging and treatment were performed at the investigators' discretion and documented over 24 months. Overall, 744 RVO patients (27% BRVO, 16% CRVO, remaining unspecified RVO) were included. For 74% of patients, data were available for the 12-month visit and for 56% for the 24-month visit. Mean baseline BCVA was 52.0 Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (BRVO: 55.9, CRVO: 43.9). BCVA improved rapidly within the first 3 months, reaching 64.3 letters at 12 months and 64.7 at 24 months. CRVO patients showed less improvement than those with BRVO. Patients received a median of 4 (5) injections over 12 (24) months, with 100% of patients receiving injections at baseline, 70% at Month 1 and 81% at Month 2. Overall, 40% of patients demonstrated a ≥15 letter increase within the first 3 months (42% BRVO, 46% CRVO). Patients with low initial BCVA (<50 letters) showed greater improvement than patients with higher baseline BCVA. Due to considerable loss to follow-up, the number of injections and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations were not associated with the change in BCVA. Patients with RVO in routine practice in Germany received fewer injections and fewer OCT examinations than in clinical trials. CRVO patients showed less and later improvement compared to BRVO patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31806930
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S209253
pii: 209253
pmc: PMC6847987
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2167-2179Informations de copyright
© 2019 Callizo et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Josep Callizo received personal fees and research grants from Novartis and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare and Allergan. Focke Ziemssen received grants and personal fees from Biogen, Allergan, Alimera, Bayer Healthcare and Roche, grants from Clearside, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, NovoNordisk, MSD Sharp & Dohme. Thomas Bertelmann received research grants from Novartis, personal fees from Alcon, Alimera, Allergan, Bayer, Heidelberg, Novartis, and was a Medical Advisor for Novartis (2015–2016). Nicolas Feltgen has received funds from Novartis, Allergan, Bayer, Alimera, Heidelberg Engineering, and Roche. Jessica Voegeler and Mirja Koch are Novartis employees. Nicole Eter received research grants from Novartis and Bayer, speaker’s honorarium from Novartis, Bayer, Allergan, Heidelberg Engineering, and Alimera, and served on Advisory Boards for Novartis, Bayer, Allergan, Alimera, and Roche. Sandra Liakopoulos received speaker’s fees from Novartis, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Heidelberg Engineering, Allergan, Bayer; non-financial research support from Carl Zeiss Meditec and Heidelberg Engineering and was member of an advisory board for Novartis. Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg received grants and non-financial research funding from Accucela, Alcon/Novartis, Allergan, Bayer, Bioeq/Formycon, Centervue, Genentech/Roche, Heidelberg Engineering, Optos, Carl Zeiss MediTec, and personal fees and honoraria from Alcon/Novartis, Bayer, Genentech/Roche, Carl Zeiss MediTec. Georg Spital received personal fees from Bayer Healthcare, Novartis, Carl Zeiss Meditec, OD-OS. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015 Sep;38(7):620-7
pubmed: 25913443
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1124-1133.e1
pubmed: 20381871
Ophthalmologe. 2016 Feb;113(2):143-51
pubmed: 26201460
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;101(3):353-359
pubmed: 27215744
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Jun;2(6):539-549
pubmed: 31047606
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 03;12:621-629
pubmed: 29662298
Ophthalmology. 2011 Oct;118(10):2041-9
pubmed: 21715011
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;96(1):e10-e18
pubmed: 28251811
Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;90(2):e98-e103
pubmed: 22066978
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;96(8):e933-e941
pubmed: 29855153
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Jun 1;48(6):465-472
pubmed: 28613352
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 20;12:13-20
pubmed: 29339917
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):220-6
pubmed: 25193672
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:258-267
pubmed: 27163237
Retina. 2016 Mar;36(3):432-48
pubmed: 26716954
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 25;9:1779-84
pubmed: 26445525
Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug;118(8):1594-602
pubmed: 21684606
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 01;(5):CD007325
pubmed: 24788977
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 May;101(5):574-579
pubmed: 27503394
Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1778-1787
pubmed: 28807635
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug 26;8:1611-21
pubmed: 25210429
Intern Med J. 2008 Dec;38(12):904-10
pubmed: 19120547
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 May;251(5):1281-4
pubmed: 23086225
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1101-11
pubmed: 26896124
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1102-1112.e1
pubmed: 20398941
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):7
pubmed: 28103831
Eye (Lond). 2015 Mar;29(3):380-7
pubmed: 25572584
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):802-9
pubmed: 22301066
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1113-1123.e15
pubmed: 20430446
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;255(10):1899-1905
pubmed: 28620704