Dietary patterns associated with dental caries in adults in the United States.
NHANES
cariogenic agent
dental decay
diet
dietary sugars
Journal
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
ISSN: 1600-0528
Titre abrégé: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 0410263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
04
02
2019
revised:
30
09
2019
accepted:
03
11
2019
pubmed:
7
12
2019
medline:
20
9
2020
entrez:
7
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dental caries experience, which affects 91% of US adults, is a consequence of a carious process influenced by diet. Although individual foods have been implicated, we hypothesized that dietary patterns might be important predictors of caries presence. We analysed data from 4467 people ≥18 years old participating in the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative sample of the US population. Data from 24-hour dietary recalls were classified into standard food categories and reduced to three dietary patterns using principal components (PCs) analysis. We used regression to model the log-transformed decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) score and the prevalence of any caries experience by quartiles of PC scores, controlling for potential confounders. Dietary patterns differed by age with respect to dental caries so 18-30-year-olds (n = 1074) and >30-year-olds (n = 3393) were analysed separately. Similar dietary patterns existed among individuals aged 18-30 and >30 years, but the prevalence of DMFT score >0 and the median of DMFT was greater in those >30:78.7% (95% CI: 76.1, 81.3) vs 92.6% (95% CI: 91.4, 93.7) and 4 (95% CI: 4, 5) vs 12 DMFT (95% CI: 11, 13), respectively. In those 18-30, no dietary pattern was associated with greater prevalence or severity of dental caries experience. Among those >30, the prevalence of DMFT>0 was higher by 2% for those in each subsequent quartile of a diet high in sugar-sweetened beverages and sandwiches (adjusted PR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.001, 1.03)-thus, the prevalence of dental caries experience was 6% higher among those in the uppermost quartile than in the lowest quartile. For every subsequent quartile in the same pattern, there was a 1.98% higher (95% CI: 0.15, 3.85) DMFT score. However, analysis using the two strongest loading food groups from any of the PCs did not identify any predictors of caries experience. Dietary patterns were associated with the prevalence of dental caries experience, with differing findings by age. Although effect sizes were small, the population impact may be substantial. While food groups high in sugar were associated with caries prevalence and severity, associations were more apparent in the context of overall diet. Prospective studies are needed to confirm whether particular dietary patterns are causally related to the development of dental caries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31809561
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12509
pmc: PMC7056496
mid: NIHMS1058057
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119-129Subventions
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R01 DE014899
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : T32 DK071212
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HG000040
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Int Dent J. 2013 Dec;63 Suppl 2:64-72
pubmed: 24283286
Nutrition. 2012 Jul;28(7-8):779-84
pubmed: 22459555
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702-6
pubmed: 15033648
Eur J Oral Sci. 2003 Aug;111(4):316-25
pubmed: 12887397
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Sep;83(9):670-6
pubmed: 16211158
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Sep;63(9):1812-9
pubmed: 26280256
Int Dent J. 2014 Feb;64(1):52-7
pubmed: 24117172
Arch Oral Biol. 1984;29(12):983-92
pubmed: 6598368
Lancet. 2007 Jan 6;369(9555):51-9
pubmed: 17208642
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;41(4):364-73
pubmed: 23106439
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 16;14:863
pubmed: 25228012
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Feb;7(1A):201-26
pubmed: 14972061
Acta Odontol Scand. 2015 Aug;73(6):467-73
pubmed: 25467782
Gerodontology. 2009 Jun;26(2):130-6
pubmed: 19490135
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972
pubmed: 30954305
Dent Clin North Am. 2005 Apr;49(2):293-308
pubmed: 15755406
Vital Health Stat 11. 2007 Apr;(248):1-92
pubmed: 17633507
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002 Feb;13(1):3-9
pubmed: 11790957
J Dent. 2014 Aug;42(8):952-8
pubmed: 24813370
Nutr Rev. 2014 Feb;72(2):68-81
pubmed: 24330063
J Dent Res. 2006 Mar;85(3):262-6
pubmed: 16498075
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Apr;44(4):291-298
pubmed: 28032898
Br Dent J. 2004 Jan 24;196(2):89-92; discussion 87
pubmed: 14739966
J Dent Res. 2001 Oct;80(10):1949-53
pubmed: 11706958
J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(8):845-854
pubmed: 28489474
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):249-260
pubmed: 31327369
Caries Res. 2006;40(6):473-80
pubmed: 17063017
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 21;13(3):e0193504
pubmed: 29561863
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 May 25;3:17030
pubmed: 28540937
J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Jul;139(7):959-67; quiz 995
pubmed: 18594082
J Dent Res. 2014 Jan;93(1):8-18
pubmed: 24323509
J Dent Res. 2016 Feb;95(2):167-72
pubmed: 26553884