Validation of automated pipetting systems for cell culture seeding, exposure and bio-analytical assays in sulfur mustard toxicology.
Apoptosis
/ drug effects
Automation, Laboratory
/ standards
Cell Line
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Chemical Warfare Agents
/ toxicity
Humans
Interleukin-6
/ metabolism
Interleukin-8
/ metabolism
Keratinocytes
/ drug effects
Materials Testing
Mustard Gas
/ toxicity
Necrosis
Tissue Culture Techniques
/ standards
Toxicity Tests
/ standards
Automated pipetting
HaCaT cells
Keratinocytes
Sulfur mustard
Toxicology
Journal
Toxicology letters
ISSN: 1879-3169
Titre abrégé: Toxicol Lett
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7709027
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2020
01 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
30
09
2019
revised:
28
11
2019
accepted:
01
12
2019
pubmed:
7
12
2019
medline:
14
1
2020
entrez:
7
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In vitro cell culture experiments are highly important techniques to accelerate drug discovery, conduct safety testing and reduce the need for animal studies. Therefore, automatization may help to enhance the technical precision, reduce external (including operator's) influence on the data and thus improve reliability. Prior to application in scientific studies, validation of automated systems is absolutely necessary. In this study we present the validation of two combined automated pipetting systems to conduct toxicity studies in HaCaT cells consisting of cell seeding, noxious agent exposure and several assays to assess cell survival, apoptosis and interleukin production. After initial validation of pipetting accuracy, we compared homogeneity after automated seeding to plates seeded by expert laboratory technicians. Moreover, automated dispensing of a potentially unstable noxious agent was analyzed in terms of speed and consistency. We found a 2 % technical imprecision for the cell survival assay and 4.5-6 % for the other assays, bioluminescent and ELISA techniques. Thus, we could demonstrate the excellent technical precision of our assays. In a final step, we found that intraday variations, though acceptable, were much larger than technical variations and had to assume an intraday biological variability between different wells of the same experimental group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31809884
pii: S0378-4274(19)30388-1
doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.12.003
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
CXCL8 protein, human
0
Chemical Warfare Agents
0
IL6 protein, human
0
Interleukin-6
0
Interleukin-8
0
Mustard Gas
T8KEC9FH9P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
80-86Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.