Donor-site morbidity after harvesting of radial forearm free flaps-comparison of vacuum-assisted closure with conventional wound care: A randomized controlled trial.
Adult
Aged
Female
Forearm
/ blood supply
Free Tissue Flaps
/ blood supply
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
Postoperative Complications
/ prevention & control
Prospective Studies
Skin Transplantation
/ methods
Tissue and Organ Harvesting
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
/ physiology
Donor-site morbidity
Healing time
Negative-pressure wound therapy
Radial forearm free flap
Vacuum-assisted-closure wound therapy
Journal
Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
ISSN: 1878-4119
Titre abrégé: J Craniomaxillofac Surg
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 8704309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
12
09
2019
revised:
01
11
2019
accepted:
16
11
2019
pubmed:
8
12
2019
medline:
1
1
2020
entrez:
8
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) are often used to replace tissue removed in head and neck surgery. In recent years, many attempts have been made to reduce donor-site morbidity and to prevent common complications such as infection, skin-graft necrosis, tendon exposure and subsequent impairment of hand function. One promising option is the use of vacuum-assisted-closure wound therapy (VAC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of VAC compared with a conventional bolster dressing (CBD). A randomized controlled trial was enrolled. Our study was prospective in design and included patients with a skin-grafted forearm defect after harvesting of RFFF. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into two study arms. The predictor variable was the type of wound therapy (VAC therapy compared with CBD) and the outcome variables were (1) the size of the wound area, (2) wrist movement and (3) grip strength. Outcome variables were assessed 12 days, three weeks and eight weeks after surgery. Fifty patients (33 males, mean age 61.7 years [SD 15.5]; 17 females, mean age 54.7 years [SD 10.5]) were included consecutively in the study. Patients in the VAC group experienced a faster postsurgical reduction of wound area and had better wrist movement; nonetheless, the differences between the VAC group and CBD group did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, the recovery of postsurgical grip strength was significantly faster in the VAC group. Our study failed to prove that VAC therapy is significantly superior to CBD for all the variable studied. Because VAC therapy has some positive effects, however, we recommend further development of this negative-pressure wound treatment, rather than the termination of its use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31810850
pii: S1010-5182(19)31106-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.11.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1980-1985Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.