The horizontal calcaneofibular ligament: a sign of hindfoot valgus on ankle MRI.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ankle Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Foot Deformities
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Lateral Ligament, Ankle
/ diagnostic imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Young Adult
Hindfoot
Lower limb
MRI
Tibio-calcaneal angle
Valgus
Journal
Skeletal radiology
ISSN: 1432-2161
Titre abrégé: Skeletal Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7701953
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
05
03
2019
accepted:
10
11
2019
revised:
05
11
2019
pubmed:
8
12
2019
medline:
26
1
2021
entrez:
8
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hindfoot valgus malalignment has been assessed on coronal MRI by the measurement of the tibio-calcaneal (TC) angle and apparent moment arm (AMA). This study aimed to determine if the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) angle could be used as a further marker of hindfoot valgus malalignment on routine non-weight-bearing ankle MRI. One hundred ninety-five consecutive 3-T ankle MRI studies were identified from the hospital PACS system. The TC and CFL angles could be measured in 155 cases (78%), and the AMA on 153 cases. The study group comprised 56 males and 72 females with a mean age of 46 years (range 4-89 years). In 27 patients, both ankles had been imaged. The Pearson correlation between the TC and CFL angles was -0.43, with a corresponding p value of 0.001 indicating a strong negative correlation between the TC and CFL angles. The CFL angle was significantly lower in those with hindfoot valgus (113 ± 14) compared with those without (123° ± 15°) (p = 0.001). The optimal cut-off point of the CFL angle for hindfoot valgus was ≤119°, with a sensitivity and specificity of 66% and 63% respectively. The Pearson correlation between the CFL angle and AMA was -0.10, with a corresponding p value of 0.21 indicating a weak negative correlation that did not reach statistical significance. Hindfoot valgus as estimated by the increased TC angle on coronal non-weight-bearing ankle MRI is associated with a reduced CFL angle on sagittal MR images, but is not associated with AMA. Therefore, a horizontal orientation of the CFL on sagittal MR images may be a further useful sign of hindfoot valgus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31811347
doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03347-1
pii: 10.1007/s00256-019-03347-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
739-746Références
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Nov;27(11):965-9
pubmed: 17144961
Case Rep Orthop. 2018 Sep 9;2018:5376384
pubmed: 30271647
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Dec 28;10:60
pubmed: 29299066
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Nov;36(11):1352-61
pubmed: 26116431
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 1;12(12):e0187201
pubmed: 29194449
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep;175(3):627-35
pubmed: 10954441
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Nov;30(11):1078-82
pubmed: 19912718
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1984;70(4):325-34
pubmed: 6147883
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Mar;58(2):243-247
pubmed: 30583836
Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):553-8
pubmed: 24071992
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Jul-Aug;(118):202-7
pubmed: 954279
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Dec;6(4):294-303
pubmed: 23765382
Foot Ankle Int. 1995 Sep;16(9):572-6
pubmed: 8563927
BMJ. 2004 Dec 4;329(7478):1328-33
pubmed: 15576744
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Sep;167(3):675-82
pubmed: 8751680
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6 Suppl):S51-8
pubmed: 20489117
Foot Ankle Int. 1997 May;18(5):277-83
pubmed: 9167927
Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2594-601
pubmed: 23579419
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 May-Jun;50(3):320-8
pubmed: 21459628
Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Dec;22(4):233-238
pubmed: 27810020
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Dec;13(12):1999-2008
pubmed: 29524088
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jan;58(1):165-170
pubmed: 30583777
Skeletal Radiol. 2018 Jan;47(1):19-24
pubmed: 28799095
Br J Radiol. 2008 Oct;81(970):826-36
pubmed: 18591197
J Foot Ankle Res. 2013 Dec 13;6(1):48
pubmed: 24330613
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Sep;193(3):672-8
pubmed: 19696280
Skeletal Radiol. 2010 Nov;39(11):1103-8
pubmed: 20062985
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Oct;99(6 Suppl):S345-55
pubmed: 23978710
Surg Radiol Anat. 2019 Mar;41(3):307-311
pubmed: 30539208
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):578-82
pubmed: 21862799