Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 12 2019
Historique:
received: 10 10 2019
accepted: 22 11 2019
entrez: 10 12 2019
pubmed: 10 12 2019
medline: 11 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Māori, Pacific and Asian women in New Zealand have lower cervical-cancer screening rates than European women, and there are persistent inequities in cervical cancer outcomes for Māori and Pacific women. Innovative ways to address access barriers are required. New Zealand is transitioning to screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, which could allow women themselves, rather than a clinician, to take the sample. Internationally, self-sampling has been found to increase screening participation rates. The aim of this open-label community-based randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether self-sampling increases screening participation among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women in New Zealand. We aim to invite at least 3550 un- or under-screened (≥5 years overdue) Māori, Pacific and Asian women (1050, 1250, 1250 respectively), aged 30-69 years, for screening. The three study arms are: usual care in which women are invited to attend a clinic for a standard clinician-collected cytology test; clinic-based self-sampling in which women are invited to take a self-sample at their usual general practice; and mail-out self-sampling in which women are mailed a kit and invited to take a self-sample at home. Women will be randomised 3:3:1 to the clinic and mail-out self-sampling groups, and usual care. There is also a nested sub-study in which non-responding women in all allocation groups, when they subsequently present to the clinic for other reasons, are offered clinic or home-kit self-sampling. The primary outcome will be the proportion of women who participate (by taking a self-sample or cytology test). This trial is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of mailed self-sampling in New Zealand and will be one of the first internationally to evaluate the effectiveness of opportunistic in-clinic invitations for self-sampling. The trial will provide robust evidence on the impact on participation proportions from different invitation approaches for HPV self-sampling in New Zealand un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women. ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12618000367246 (date registered 12/3/2018) https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371741&isReview=true; UTN: U1111-1189-0531.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Māori, Pacific and Asian women in New Zealand have lower cervical-cancer screening rates than European women, and there are persistent inequities in cervical cancer outcomes for Māori and Pacific women. Innovative ways to address access barriers are required. New Zealand is transitioning to screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, which could allow women themselves, rather than a clinician, to take the sample. Internationally, self-sampling has been found to increase screening participation rates. The aim of this open-label community-based randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether self-sampling increases screening participation among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women in New Zealand.
METHODS/DESIGN
We aim to invite at least 3550 un- or under-screened (≥5 years overdue) Māori, Pacific and Asian women (1050, 1250, 1250 respectively), aged 30-69 years, for screening. The three study arms are: usual care in which women are invited to attend a clinic for a standard clinician-collected cytology test; clinic-based self-sampling in which women are invited to take a self-sample at their usual general practice; and mail-out self-sampling in which women are mailed a kit and invited to take a self-sample at home. Women will be randomised 3:3:1 to the clinic and mail-out self-sampling groups, and usual care. There is also a nested sub-study in which non-responding women in all allocation groups, when they subsequently present to the clinic for other reasons, are offered clinic or home-kit self-sampling. The primary outcome will be the proportion of women who participate (by taking a self-sample or cytology test).
DISCUSSION
This trial is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of mailed self-sampling in New Zealand and will be one of the first internationally to evaluate the effectiveness of opportunistic in-clinic invitations for self-sampling. The trial will provide robust evidence on the impact on participation proportions from different invitation approaches for HPV self-sampling in New Zealand un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12618000367246 (date registered 12/3/2018) https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371741&isReview=true; UTN: U1111-1189-0531.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31815615
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6401-y
pii: 10.1186/s12885-019-6401-y
pmc: PMC6902319
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1198

Subventions

Organisme : Health Research Council of New Zealand
ID : 16/405
Pays : International

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

BMJ. 2018 Dec 5;363:k4823
pubmed: 30518635
Int J Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;119(5):1095-101
pubmed: 16586444
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2375-85
pubmed: 26296294
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0151978
pubmed: 27073929
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jul;112(10):1047-50
pubmed: 15238274
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Oct;47(5):415-8
pubmed: 17877602
Int J Cancer. 2015 Feb 1;136(3):646-55
pubmed: 24923998
Can J Public Health. 2013 Feb 11;104(2):e159-66
pubmed: 23618210
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Sep;21(9):817-26
pubmed: 25936581
Sex Health. 2015 Aug;12(4):279-86
pubmed: 26028338
J Community Health. 2014 Oct;39(5):849-56
pubmed: 25120228
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):301-307
pubmed: 30614524
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;39(1):156-65
pubmed: 19808843
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(4):1565-70
pubmed: 25743832
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 13;13:464
pubmed: 23663511
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Feb;3(2):e85-94
pubmed: 25617202
N Z Med J. 2019 Jun 21;132(1497):21-31
pubmed: 31220062
Br J Cancer. 2011 Jan 18;104(2):248-54
pubmed: 21179038
PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0151619
pubmed: 27187495
Int J Cancer. 2016 Jul 15;139(2):281-90
pubmed: 26850941
J Clin Virol. 2015 Aug;69:210-3
pubmed: 26209409
Med J Aust. 2016 Mar 21;204(5):171
pubmed: 26985836
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 May;24(5):769-72
pubmed: 25713024
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83
pubmed: 24433684
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 04;15:849
pubmed: 26536865
J Pathol. 1999 Sep;189(1):12-9
pubmed: 10451482
J Med Screen. 2015 Jun;22(2):93-9
pubmed: 25742805
Int J Cancer. 2013 May 15;132(10):2223-36
pubmed: 22907569
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 25;6(4):e010660
pubmed: 27113237

Auteurs

Naomi Brewer (N)

Centre for Public Health Research, College of Health, Massey University, PO Box 756, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand. N.Brewer@massey.ac.nz.

Karen Bartholomew (K)

Waitematā District Health Board (DHB) and Auckland DHB, Private Bag 93-503, Takapuna, Auckland, 0740, New Zealand.

Anna Maxwell (A)

Waitematā District Health Board (DHB) and Auckland DHB, Private Bag 93-503, Takapuna, Auckland, 0740, New Zealand.

Jane Grant (J)

Waitematā District Health Board (DHB) and Auckland DHB, Private Bag 93-503, Takapuna, Auckland, 0740, New Zealand.

Helen Wihongi (H)

Waitematā District Health Board (DHB) and Auckland DHB, Private Bag 93-503, Takapuna, Auckland, 0740, New Zealand.

Collette Bromhead (C)

School of Health Sciences, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.

Nina Scott (N)

University of Auckland, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Sue Crengle (S)

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Chris Cunningham (C)

Research Centre for Māori Health and Development, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.

Jeroen Douwes (J)

Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.

John D Potter (JD)

Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH