Cost-Effectiveness Of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy In COPD: The IMPACT Trial.
Administration, Inhalation
Aged
Androstadienes
/ administration & dosage
Benzyl Alcohols
/ administration & dosage
Bronchodilator Agents
/ administration & dosage
Canada
Chlorobenzenes
/ administration & dosage
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Disease Progression
Drug Combinations
Drug Costs
Female
Humans
Lung
/ drug effects
Male
Models, Economic
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
/ diagnosis
Quality of Life
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Quinuclidines
/ administration & dosage
Recovery of Function
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Canada
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
cost-effectiveness
quality-adjusted life years
single-inhaler triple therapy
Journal
International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
ISSN: 1178-2005
Titre abrégé: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101273481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
17
05
2019
accepted:
01
11
2019
entrez:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
11
12
2019
medline:
28
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We assessed the cost-effectiveness of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI from a Canadian public healthcare perspective, incorporating data from the IMPACT trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (NCT02164513). Baseline inputs and treatment effects from IMPACT were populated into the validated GALAXY-COPD disease progression model. Canadian unit costs and drug costs (Canadian dollars [C$], 2017) were applied to healthcare resource utilization and treatments. Future costs and health outcomes were discounted at 1.5% annually. Analyses were probabilistic, and outputs included exacerbation rates, costs, and life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI over a lifetime horizon, the analyses predicted that treatment with FF/UMEC/VI resulted in fewer moderate and severe exacerbations, more LYs and more QALYs gained, with a small incremental cost. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY gained was C$18,989 (95% confidence interval [CI]: C$14,665, C$25,753) versus FF/VI and C$13,776 (95% CI: C$9787, C$19,448) versus UMEC/VI. FF/UMEC/VI remained cost-effective versus both FF/VI and UMEC/VI in all sensitivity analyses, including in scenario analyses that considered different intervention and comparator discontinuation rates, and treatment effects for subsequent therapy. Treatment with FF/UMEC/VI was predicted to improve outcomes and be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations compared with FF/VI or UMEC/VI, in Canada.
Sections du résumé
Background
We assessed the cost-effectiveness of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI from a Canadian public healthcare perspective, incorporating data from the IMPACT trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (NCT02164513).
Methods
Baseline inputs and treatment effects from IMPACT were populated into the validated GALAXY-COPD disease progression model. Canadian unit costs and drug costs (Canadian dollars [C$], 2017) were applied to healthcare resource utilization and treatments. Future costs and health outcomes were discounted at 1.5% annually. Analyses were probabilistic, and outputs included exacerbation rates, costs, and life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.
Results
Compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI over a lifetime horizon, the analyses predicted that treatment with FF/UMEC/VI resulted in fewer moderate and severe exacerbations, more LYs and more QALYs gained, with a small incremental cost. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY gained was C$18,989 (95% confidence interval [CI]: C$14,665, C$25,753) versus FF/VI and C$13,776 (95% CI: C$9787, C$19,448) versus UMEC/VI. FF/UMEC/VI remained cost-effective versus both FF/VI and UMEC/VI in all sensitivity analyses, including in scenario analyses that considered different intervention and comparator discontinuation rates, and treatment effects for subsequent therapy.
Conclusion
Treatment with FF/UMEC/VI was predicted to improve outcomes and be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations compared with FF/VI or UMEC/VI, in Canada.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31819401
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S216072
pii: 216072
pmc: PMC6890193
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androstadienes
0
Benzyl Alcohols
0
Bronchodilator Agents
0
Chlorobenzenes
0
Drug Combinations
0
GSK573719
0
Quinuclidines
0
vilanterol
028LZY775B
fluticasone furoate
JS86977WNV
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02164513']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2681-2695Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N024842/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Ismaila et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following conflicts of interest during the last three years in relation to this article: A.S. Ismaila, M. Schroeder and A. Martin are employees of, and hold shares in, GlaxoSmithKline plc.; A.S. Ismaila is also an unpaid, part-time professor at McMaster University, Canada. E.C. Goodall is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline plc. N. Risebrough, D. Shah and K. Ndirangu are employees of ICON plc., which received funding from GlaxoSmithKline plc. to conduct this study, but were not themselves paid for development of this article. G. Criner reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline plc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Mereo, AstraZeneca, Pulmonx, PneumRx, Olympus, Broncus, Lungpacer, Mereo, Nuvaira, ResMed, Respironics and Patara, Pearl, and Sanofi, personal fees from Verona, BTG, EOLO and NGM, and grants from ALung, Fisher Paykel and Galapagos, outside the submitted work. M. Dransfield reports personal and other fees from GlaxoSmithKline plc. during the conduct of this study, and grants from Department of Defense, personal and other fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline plc., AstraZeneca and PneumRx/BTG, personal fees from Genentech, Quark Pharmaceuticals and Mereo, grants from NIH and American Lung Association and other fees from Novartis, Yungjin, Pulmonx and Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. D.M.G. Halpin reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline plc. and Pfizer, and personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis, outside the submitted work. M.L. Han reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline plc. during the conduct of this study, and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline plc., Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Mylan, and other fees from Novartis and Sunovion, outside of the submitted work. D.A. Lomas reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline plc. during the conduct of the study, and personal fees and grants from GlaxoSmithKline plc., and personal fees from Griffols, outside of the submitted work. D.A. Lomas also chaired the Respiratory Therapy Area Board at GlaxoSmithKline plc. between 2012 and 2015. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Nov 1;184(9):681-689
pubmed: 27737842
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A560-1
pubmed: 27201846
Eur Respir J. 2013 Sep;42(3):647-54
pubmed: 23258783
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Mar 18;15:595-604
pubmed: 32256060
Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):354-60
pubmed: 21402304
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):397-403
pubmed: 28292484
N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 22;356(8):775-89
pubmed: 17314337
Med Decis Making. 2017 May;37(4):469-480
pubmed: 27317436
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 May;29(5):403-14
pubmed: 21504240
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Feb 13;14:391-401
pubmed: 30863039
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 Jan;20(1):11-23
pubmed: 26688525
N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 4;350(10):1005-12
pubmed: 14999112
Eur Respir J. 2008 Apr;31(4):869-73
pubmed: 18216052
Chest. 2006 Oct;130(4):1117-28
pubmed: 17035446
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):525-36
pubmed: 25128045
Med Decis Making. 2017 May;37(4):453-468
pubmed: 26449490
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(1):71-88
pubmed: 18488430
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1039-47
pubmed: 22152172
Med Decis Making. 2017 May;37(4):440-452
pubmed: 27486218
Respir Res. 2010 Sep 10;11:122
pubmed: 20831787
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 03;378(18):1671-1680
pubmed: 29668352
Respir Med. 2018 Dec;145:130-137
pubmed: 30509701
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jan 14;168(1):71-9
pubmed: 18195198
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep 15;176(6):532-55
pubmed: 17507545
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(6):619-37
pubmed: 15960557
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 21;8:464
pubmed: 26391471
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):788-798
pubmed: 33108212