Determinants and outcome of repeat continuous electroencephalogram monitoring-A case-control study.
acute seizures
anti‐epileptic drugs
cEEG monitoring
continuous EEG
predictors
Journal
Epilepsia open
ISSN: 2470-9239
Titre abrégé: Epilepsia Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101692036
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
revised:
28
08
2019
accepted:
09
09
2019
entrez:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
11
12
2019
medline:
11
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A retrospective, single-center study to analyze the determinants of a repeat continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring during hospitalization and its outcomes using a matched case-control study design. Adults with a repeat cEEG session (cases) were matched by age (±3 years), gender, and mental status to patients with a single cEEG (controls) during hospitalization. Several clinical and EEG characteristics were analyzed to identify predictors of repeat cEEG. Repeat cEEG outcomes were analyzed based on its yield of electrographic seizure. We investigated the predictors of finding increased epileptic potential (degree of association with electrographic seizures) on the repeat cEEG, a marker for possible anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) management change. A total of 213 (8.6% of all unique cEEG patients) cases were included. A multivariable conditional logistic regression model comparing cases and controls showed that the presence of acute brain insult [odds ratio (OR) = 3.36, 95% CI = 1.26-8.94, Repeat cEEG is not an uncommon practice. It leads to the diagnosis of electrographic seizures in a significant percentage of patients. With the potential of impacting AED management in 16%-21% patients, it should be considered in high-risk patients suffering acute brain insults undergoing prolonged hospitalization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31819913
doi: 10.1002/epi4.12361
pii: EPI412361
pmc: PMC6885659
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
572-580Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
Références
Neurology. 2012 Nov 6;79(19):1951-60
pubmed: 23035068
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Mar;126(3):463-71
pubmed: 25082090
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;22(2):79-91
pubmed: 15805807
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jul;35(4):325-331
pubmed: 29677014
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jan;35(1):71-76
pubmed: 29099408
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Feb 01;74(2):181-188
pubmed: 27992625
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Apr;128(4):570-578
pubmed: 28231475
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr;32(2):87-95
pubmed: 25626778
Neurology. 2013 Dec 3;81(23):2002-8
pubmed: 24186910
JAMA Neurol. 2013 Oct;70(10):1288-95
pubmed: 23921464
Neurology. 2019 Jan 1;92(1):e9-e18
pubmed: 30504428
J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):60-5
pubmed: 24268622
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:21-41
pubmed: 10590974
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1419-1424
pubmed: 29052706
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):3-8
pubmed: 29139014
Epilepsia. 2013 Sep;54 Suppl 6:28-9
pubmed: 24001066
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;127(4):2056-64
pubmed: 26971489
Ann Neurol. 2017 Aug;82(2):177-185
pubmed: 28681492
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2016 Feb;18(2):8
pubmed: 26874841
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:250-4
pubmed: 26198216
Epilepsia Open. 2019 Sep 23;4(4):572-580
pubmed: 31819913
Neurology. 2004 May 25;62(10):1743-8
pubmed: 15159471
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 May;35(3):199-207
pubmed: 29718829