The functional body: does body representation reflect functional properties?
Bodily awareness
Body action
Body image
Body representation
Body schema
Posture
Journal
Experimental brain research
ISSN: 1432-1106
Titre abrégé: Exp Brain Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0043312
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
27
08
2019
accepted:
29
11
2019
pubmed:
12
12
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
12
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a growing interest in the distortions of body representation in healthy population and most studies have focused their attention on specific parts of the body, such as the hands. Only three studies have considered the representation of the body as a whole. Findings, acquired by different means of assessment methods, are partially contrasting, leading to different interpretations. The present study aims to investigate which aspects of body representation can be preserved regardless of the method adopted and whether current and previous findings can be explained by a unique theoretical model. In Experiments 1a and 1b, we adopted a modified version of the Body Image Task to investigate body representations in real scale and the relationship of its parts. Participants judged the location of body landmarks by pointing on their own silhouette imagined on a wall in front of them. In Experiment 2, we investigated (i) whether the pattern of distortions observed in the first experiment are maintained across different methods by asking participants to estimate the veracity and proportionality of the length of their own body parts; and (ii) whether similar distortions can be generalized to stereotypical representations. Overall, we observed a consistent pattern of distortions, whereby upper body limbs are underestimated and lower parts of the body are overestimated across all experiments and conditions. These findings are then interpreted as the result of a functional relationship between body parts and daily actions, which underlie a close modulation of body schema and body image. This interpretation offers a reconciliation of seemingly contradictory findings in the literature and supports to the co-construction model (Pitron et al. in Conscious Cognit 65:352-358, 2018).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31822933
doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05705-w
pii: 10.1007/s00221-019-05705-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
153-169Références
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jan;200(1):25-35
pubmed: 19690846
Cognition. 2017 May;162:41-47
pubmed: 28196766
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 14;8(1):13847
pubmed: 30218103
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):655-68
pubmed: 19720070
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):9-13
pubmed: 21895388
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:385-92
pubmed: 25462198
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Apr;17(4):543-53
pubmed: 15829076
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Mar;62(3):500-12
pubmed: 18609376
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:63-68
pubmed: 30219412
Brain. 1988 Apr;111 ( Pt 2):281-97
pubmed: 3378137
Brain. 1991 Feb;114 ( Pt 1B):629-42
pubmed: 2004260
Cogn Process. 2004 Jun;5(2):94-105
pubmed: 16467906
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jan;122:38-50
pubmed: 30500663
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Jul;43:177-96
pubmed: 27310110
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):302-8
pubmed: 21327375
Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Apr;30(2):189-201; discussion 201-39
pubmed: 17705910
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):720-6
pubmed: 21480744
Cortex. 2019 Feb;111:74-86
pubmed: 30471452
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):669-80
pubmed: 19786038
Conscious Cogn. 2018 May;61:107-116
pubmed: 29373301
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(1):204-11
pubmed: 18762203
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):11727-32
pubmed: 20547858
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;10(4):215-21
pubmed: 11794546
Brain. 1998 Sep;121 ( Pt 9):1603-30
pubmed: 9762952
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Oct;65:352-358
pubmed: 30262229
Brain Topogr. 2009 May;21(3-4):252-60
pubmed: 19387818
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):103-13
pubmed: 25494548
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(9):2187-94
pubmed: 22683448
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1194-1201
pubmed: 21199662
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):344-51
pubmed: 23933684
Neuroscientist. 2014 Apr;20(2):122-35
pubmed: 24334708
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:115-121
pubmed: 28658652
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Jun 1;18(4):289-306
pubmed: 20945217
Neuropsychologia. 2009 May;47(6):1615-20
pubmed: 19038277
Curr Biol. 2009 Jun 23;19(12):R478-9
pubmed: 19549491
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;84(2):201-7
pubmed: 23204474
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Nov;71(11):2314-2324
pubmed: 30362401
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Feb;237(2):493-501
pubmed: 30460395
Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):756
pubmed: 9486643
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jul;228(1):25-42
pubmed: 23640106
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1204-1216
pubmed: 28205054
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Oct;141(2):164-8
pubmed: 22964057
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):73-87
pubmed: 16478327