Clinically Meaningful Responses to Dupilumab in Adolescents with Uncontrolled Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Post-hoc Analyses from a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Adolescent
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ administration & dosage
Dermatitis, Atopic
/ drug therapy
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Male
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Pruritus
/ drug therapy
Quality of Life
Severity of Illness Index
Treatment Outcome
Journal
American journal of clinical dermatology
ISSN: 1179-1888
Titre abrégé: Am J Clin Dermatol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 100895290
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
12
12
2019
medline:
22
10
2020
entrez:
12
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory condition with substantial burden and limited treatment options for adolescents with moderate-to-severe disease. Significantly more patients treated with dupilumab vs. placebo achieved Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 at week 16. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of dupilumab treatment vs. placebo on the achievement of clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms and quality of life. R668-AD-1526 LIBERTY AD ADOL was a randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, phase III clinical trial. Two hundred and fifty-one adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis received dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w; n = 84), dupilumab 200 or 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w; n = 82), or placebo (n = 85). A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed on 214 patients with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16. Measures of atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms, and quality of life were assessed. Clinically meaningful improvement in one or more of three domains of signs, symptoms, and quality of life was defined as an improvement of ≥ 50% in Eczema Area and Severity Index, ≥ 3 points in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, or ≥ 6 points in the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index from baseline. Of patients receiving dupilumab q2w, 80.5% [66/82] experienced clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms, or quality of life at week 16 (vs. placebo, 20/85 [23.5%], difference 57.0% [95% confidence interval 44.5-69.4]; q4w vs. placebo, 53/84 [63.1%], difference 39.6% [95% confidence interval 25.9-53.3]; both p < 0.0001). Results were similar in adolescents with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16 (q2w, 46/62 [74.2%] vs. placebo, 18/83 [21.7%], difference 52.5% [95% confidence interval 38.5-66.6]; q4w, 38/69 [55.1%] vs. placebo, difference 33.4% [95% confidence interval 18.7-48.1]; both p < 0.0001). Dupilumab provided clinically meaningful improvements in signs, symptoms, and quality of life in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis among patients with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16. Treatment responses should be interpreted in the context of such clinically relevant patient-reported outcome measures. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03054428. Adolescents with atopic dermatitis: does dupilumab improve their signs, symptoms, and quality of life? (MP4 212916 kb).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory condition with substantial burden and limited treatment options for adolescents with moderate-to-severe disease. Significantly more patients treated with dupilumab vs. placebo achieved Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 at week 16.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of dupilumab treatment vs. placebo on the achievement of clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms and quality of life.
METHODS
METHODS
R668-AD-1526 LIBERTY AD ADOL was a randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, phase III clinical trial. Two hundred and fifty-one adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis received dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w; n = 84), dupilumab 200 or 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w; n = 82), or placebo (n = 85). A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed on 214 patients with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16. Measures of atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms, and quality of life were assessed. Clinically meaningful improvement in one or more of three domains of signs, symptoms, and quality of life was defined as an improvement of ≥ 50% in Eczema Area and Severity Index, ≥ 3 points in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, or ≥ 6 points in the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index from baseline.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of patients receiving dupilumab q2w, 80.5% [66/82] experienced clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms, or quality of life at week 16 (vs. placebo, 20/85 [23.5%], difference 57.0% [95% confidence interval 44.5-69.4]; q4w vs. placebo, 53/84 [63.1%], difference 39.6% [95% confidence interval 25.9-53.3]; both p < 0.0001). Results were similar in adolescents with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16 (q2w, 46/62 [74.2%] vs. placebo, 18/83 [21.7%], difference 52.5% [95% confidence interval 38.5-66.6]; q4w, 38/69 [55.1%] vs. placebo, difference 33.4% [95% confidence interval 18.7-48.1]; both p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Dupilumab provided clinically meaningful improvements in signs, symptoms, and quality of life in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis among patients with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16. Treatment responses should be interpreted in the context of such clinically relevant patient-reported outcome measures.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03054428. Adolescents with atopic dermatitis: does dupilumab improve their signs, symptoms, and quality of life? (MP4 212916 kb).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31823222
doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00478-y
pii: 10.1007/s40257-019-00478-y
pmc: PMC6989562
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
dupilumab
420K487FSG
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03054428']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119-131Références
World Allergy Organ J. 2014 Feb 14;7(1):4
pubmed: 24528848
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Aug 1;154(8):903-912
pubmed: 29971354
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2486-2496
pubmed: 29782217
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019 Dec;9(4):799-805
pubmed: 31641952
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jul;181(1):80-87
pubmed: 30791102
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jun;141(6):2094-2106
pubmed: 29731129
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2475-2485
pubmed: 29782224
Allergy. 2015 Jul;70(7):836-45
pubmed: 25832131
Dermatol Reports. 2011 Dec 19;4(1):e1
pubmed: 25386309
Acta Derm Venereol. 2017 Jun 9;97(6):711-714
pubmed: 28207075
Adv Ther. 2017 Aug;34(8):1989-2006
pubmed: 28707285
J Psychiatr Res. 2011 Jun;45(6):788-95
pubmed: 21111430
J Invest Dermatol. 2014 Jul;134(7):1847-1854
pubmed: 24496238
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5153-8
pubmed: 24706856
Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1353-7
pubmed: 25580670
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Sep;128(3):668-71
pubmed: 21684588
Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):40-52
pubmed: 26454361
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 May;32(5):657-682
pubmed: 29676534
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Feb;76(2):281-285
pubmed: 27855965
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):327-49
pubmed: 24813298
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):130-9
pubmed: 25006719
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2335-2348
pubmed: 27690741
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Nov 6;:
pubmed: 31693077
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Mar;178(3):768-775
pubmed: 28865094
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Dec;19(6):821-838
pubmed: 30168085
Asia Pac Allergy. 2016 Oct;6(4):213-219
pubmed: 27803881
Allergy. 2012 Jan;67(1):99-106
pubmed: 21951293
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Oct;173(4):962-8
pubmed: 25970379
Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2287-2303
pubmed: 28478972
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Oct;181(4):761-769
pubmed: 30729499
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 3;17(1):3
pubmed: 28049449
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 8;111(14):5147-52
pubmed: 24706858
Lancet. 2016 Jul 2;388(10039):31-44
pubmed: 27130691