Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery.
endometriosis
laparoscopy
ureter
urology
Journal
Facts, views & vision in ObGyn
ISSN: 2032-0418
Titre abrégé: Facts Views Vis Obgyn
Pays: Belgium
ID NLM: 101578773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez:
12
12
2019
pubmed:
12
12
2019
medline:
12
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgery for deep endometriosis often requires input from urological surgeons. This study aims to determine pre-operative and intra-operative factors that influence the need for urological input in laparoscopic resection of rectovaginal endometriosis and to assess the usefulness of a scoring system to predict this. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 230 patients undergoing laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis, at a tertiary referral centre for endometriosis in London UK, 2011 to 2015. Data from pre-operative assessment, surgery and post-operative follow up were analysed and patients were categorised according to their pre-operative and intra-operative risk factors. The primary outcome measure was the requirement of intra-operative input by urological surgeons. The median age was 35 years. In addition to the excision of endometriosis, 19.6% patients (45 patients) underwent hysterectomy, 14.8% (34 patients) required JJ stent placement, 6.1% (14 patients) had bowel resections and 2.6% (6 patients) required an ileostomy. 93.9% (216 patients) were considered normal-risk pre-operatively, of whom 89.4% (193/216) did not require any intra-operative urological input. 10.6% of this normal-risk group (23/216) required JJ stents, of whom 69.6% (16/23) also required a hysterectomy or bowel resection. Post operative complications occurred in 0.9% (2/216) of normal-risk patients, with none having required intra-operative urological reconstruction.Six percent (14 patients) were deemed to be increased-risk pre-operatively, of whom 78.6% (11/14) required JJ stent insertion. Thirty-six percent of increased-risk patients (5/14) had pre-operative renal dysfunction demonstrated on MAG3/DMSA and 80.0% of these (4/5) required intra-operative ureteric reconstruction. Patients considered normal-risk pre-operatively, planned for excision, without hysterectomy or bowel resection, can be safely managed without specific urology input. Patients with risk-features are highly likely to require urological input, particularly for JJ stent insertion. Patients with pre-operative renal dysfunction, demonstrated on MAG3/DMSA, have a high chance of requiring intra-operative ureteric reconstruction and are best managed with pre-planned reconstructive urologist input.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Surgery for deep endometriosis often requires input from urological surgeons. This study aims to determine pre-operative and intra-operative factors that influence the need for urological input in laparoscopic resection of rectovaginal endometriosis and to assess the usefulness of a scoring system to predict this.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 230 patients undergoing laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis, at a tertiary referral centre for endometriosis in London UK, 2011 to 2015. Data from pre-operative assessment, surgery and post-operative follow up were analysed and patients were categorised according to their pre-operative and intra-operative risk factors. The primary outcome measure was the requirement of intra-operative input by urological surgeons.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The median age was 35 years. In addition to the excision of endometriosis, 19.6% patients (45 patients) underwent hysterectomy, 14.8% (34 patients) required JJ stent placement, 6.1% (14 patients) had bowel resections and 2.6% (6 patients) required an ileostomy. 93.9% (216 patients) were considered normal-risk pre-operatively, of whom 89.4% (193/216) did not require any intra-operative urological input. 10.6% of this normal-risk group (23/216) required JJ stents, of whom 69.6% (16/23) also required a hysterectomy or bowel resection. Post operative complications occurred in 0.9% (2/216) of normal-risk patients, with none having required intra-operative urological reconstruction.Six percent (14 patients) were deemed to be increased-risk pre-operatively, of whom 78.6% (11/14) required JJ stent insertion. Thirty-six percent of increased-risk patients (5/14) had pre-operative renal dysfunction demonstrated on MAG3/DMSA and 80.0% of these (4/5) required intra-operative ureteric reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Patients considered normal-risk pre-operatively, planned for excision, without hysterectomy or bowel resection, can be safely managed without specific urology input. Patients with risk-features are highly likely to require urological input, particularly for JJ stent insertion. Patients with pre-operative renal dysfunction, demonstrated on MAG3/DMSA, have a high chance of requiring intra-operative ureteric reconstruction and are best managed with pre-planned reconstructive urologist input.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
111-117Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Facts, Views & Vision.
Références
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003 Dec;58(12):794-9
pubmed: 14668660
Korean J Urol. 2012 Feb;53(2):120-5
pubmed: 22379592
BJOG. 2011 Feb;118(3):292-8
pubmed: 21083863
BJOG. 2008 Aug;115(9):1159-64
pubmed: 18518868
Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):564-71
pubmed: 22938769
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):428-35
pubmed: 17630159
Hum Reprod. 2003 Jan;18(1):157-61
pubmed: 12525459
Fertil Steril. 2002 Jan;77(1):32-7
pubmed: 11779587
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 9;8(4):e018924
pubmed: 29632080
Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1424-7
pubmed: 18930224
Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):886-894
pubmed: 29202963
JSLS. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):16-24
pubmed: 15791964
Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):872-885.e1
pubmed: 29100623
BJU Int. 2004 Aug;94(3):277-89
pubmed: 15291852
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2:CD009591
pubmed: 26919512
BJOG. 2004 Apr;111(4):353-6
pubmed: 15008772
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar - Apr;24(3):466-472
pubmed: 28089810
Hum Reprod. 2009 Oct;24(10):2504-14
pubmed: 19574277