Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012.
radiotherapy equipment
radiotherapy institution
radiotherapy personnel
structure survey
Journal
Journal of radiation research
ISSN: 1349-9157
Titre abrégé: J Radiat Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jan 2020
23 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
27
08
2019
revised:
30
09
2019
pubmed:
12
12
2019
medline:
10
10
2020
entrez:
12
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 213 000 and 251 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 865 238 cases with ~24.6% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 864), telecobalt (n = 0), Gamma Knife (n = 44), 60Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and 192Ir RALS (n = 130). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 651 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 759 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 466. There were 792 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1061.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2124.2 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 181.3 FTE medical physicists, 170.9 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 841.5 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2012.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31825076
pii: 5673152
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrz077
pmc: PMC6976736
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
146-160Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Références
Cancer. 2002 Jul 1;95(1):164-71
pubmed: 12115330
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):e111-7
pubmed: 21470792
J Radiat Res. 2019 Jan 1;60(1):80-97
pubmed: 30137391
Int J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun;14(3):237-44
pubmed: 19593616
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Aug 1;62(5):1472-6
pubmed: 16029809
J Radiat Res. 2019 Nov 22;60(6):786-802
pubmed: 31665374
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Dec 1;78(5):1483-93
pubmed: 20378263
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep;35(9):497-506
pubmed: 16120622
Strahlenther Onkol. 2011 Mar;187(3):167-74
pubmed: 21347636
J Radiat Res. 2012 Sep;53(5):710-21
pubmed: 22843366
Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct;18(5):775-83
pubmed: 23053398
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):144-52
pubmed: 18374515