Analysis of laser radiation using the Nonlinear Fourier transform.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 12 2019
11 12 2019
Historique:
received:
08
11
2018
accepted:
24
10
2019
entrez:
13
12
2019
pubmed:
13
12
2019
medline:
13
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Modern high-power lasers exhibit a rich diversity of nonlinear dynamics, often featuring nontrivial co-existence of linear dispersive waves and coherent structures. While the classical Fourier method adequately describes extended dispersive waves, the analysis of time-localised and/or non-stationary signals call for more nuanced approaches. Yet, mathematical methods that can be used for simultaneous characterisation of localized and extended fields are not yet well developed. Here, we demonstrate how the Nonlinear Fourier transform (NFT) based on the Zakharov-Shabat spectral problem can be applied as a signal processing tool for representation and analysis of coherent structures embedded into dispersive radiation. We use full-field, real-time experimental measurements of mode-locked pulses to compute the nonlinear pulse spectra. For the classification of lasing regimes, we present the concept of eigenvalue probability distributions. We present two field normalisation approaches, and show the NFT can yield an effective model of the laser radiation under appropriate signal normalisation conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31827094
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13265-4
pii: 10.1038/s41467-019-13265-4
pmc: PMC6906527
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5663Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Phys Rev Lett. 2017 Jul 21;119(3):033901
pubmed: 28777604
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 09;7:12441
pubmed: 27503708
Rep Prog Phys. 2015 Nov;78(11):113901
pubmed: 26496377
Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Jan 22;116(3):033902
pubmed: 26849599
Opt Express. 2006 Oct 16;14(21):10095-100
pubmed: 19529404
Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Mar 11;116(10):103901
pubmed: 27015481
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 07;6:29238
pubmed: 27385164
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Jan;81(1 Pt 2):016608
pubmed: 20365492
Opt Lett. 2015 May 15;40(10):2277-80
pubmed: 26393718
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Jan 20;96(2):023902
pubmed: 16486576
Science. 2017 Apr 7;356(6333):50-54
pubmed: 28386005
Opt Express. 2009 Nov 9;17(23):20707-13
pubmed: 19997301
Opt Lett. 2014 Mar 15;39(6):1362-5
pubmed: 24690788
Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Apr 19;122(15):153901
pubmed: 31050515
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Apr;85(4 Pt 2):046212
pubmed: 22680561
Nat Commun. 2015 May 07;6:7004
pubmed: 25947951
Opt Express. 2017 Sep 18;25(19):23122-23127
pubmed: 29041615
Phys Rev Lett. 2015 Apr 10;114(14):143903
pubmed: 25910126
Opt Express. 2010 Aug 2;18(16):16526-38
pubmed: 20721042
Opt Lett. 2018 Dec 15;43(24):5985-5988
pubmed: 30547986
Opt Express. 2015 Sep 21;23(19):24189-94
pubmed: 26406625
Opt Express. 2016 Sep 19;24(19):21256-63
pubmed: 27661869
Opt Lett. 2016 Oct 15;41(20):4641-4644
pubmed: 28005856
Nat Commun. 2017 May 18;8:15514
pubmed: 28516955
Nat Commun. 2016 Oct 07;7:13136
pubmed: 27713416
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2012 Sep 8;468(2145):2496-2508
pubmed: 22870062
Phys Rev Lett. 2015 May 29;114(21):213901
pubmed: 26066435
Phys Rev E. 2018 Aug;98(2-1):022219
pubmed: 30253473
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 17;6:23152
pubmed: 26984634