Correlational Analysis between Joint-level Kinetics of Countermovement Jumps and Weightlifting Derivatives.
Biomechanics
net joint moments
power training
specificity
vertical jumping
Journal
Journal of sports science & medicine
ISSN: 1303-2968
Titre abrégé: J Sports Sci Med
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101174629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
13
05
2019
accepted:
10
09
2019
entrez:
13
12
2019
pubmed:
13
12
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical similarity between net joint moments (NJM) of the countermovement jump (CMJ) and the hang power clean (HPC) and jump shrug (JS). Twelve male Lacrosse players performed three maximal effort CMJs and three repetitions of the HPC and JS at 30%, 50%, and 70% of their HPC one repetition maximum (1-RM). Ground reaction forces and motion capture data were used to calculate the NJM of the hip, knee, and ankle joints during each exercise. Statistical comparison of the peak NJM indicated that NJM during the HPC and JS across all loads were equal to or greater than the NJM during the CMJ (all p < 0.025). In addition, correlation analyses indicated that CMJ hip NJM were associated (all p < 0.025) with HPC hip NJM at 30% and 70% (r = 0.611-0.822) and JS hip NJM at 50% and 70% (r = 0.674-0.739), whereas CMJ knee NJM were associated with HPC knee NJM at 70% (r = 0.638) and JS knee NJM at 50% and 70% (r = 0.664-0.732). Further, CMJ ankle NJM were associated with HPC ankle NJM at 30% and 50% (r = 0.615-0.697) and JS ankle NJM at 30%, 50%, and 70% (r = 0.735-0.824). Lastly, knee and ankle NJM during the JS were greater than during the HPC at 30% and 50% of 1-RM (all p < 0.017). The degree of mechanical similarity between the CMJ and the HPC and JS is dependent on the respective load and joint.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
663-668Informations de copyright
© Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.
Références
Sports Biomech. 2014 Mar;13(1):87-95
pubmed: 24968513
J Appl Biomech. 2012 Jul;28(3):271-8
pubmed: 21975459
J Sports Sci. 2018 Oct;36(19):2242-2249
pubmed: 29517412
J Sports Sci. 2018 Sep;36(18):2038-2044
pubmed: 29385904
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Aug;19(3):698-708
pubmed: 16095428
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Dec;25(12):3269-73
pubmed: 22080325
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb;32(2):466-474
pubmed: 27669182
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Apr;12(4):431-439
pubmed: 27400372
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Mar;22(2):412-8
pubmed: 18550955
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1235-9
pubmed: 21522071
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(16):1576-85
pubmed: 24738710
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Aug;32(8):2116-2129
pubmed: 29889775
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(Suppl 1):S127-S135
pubmed: 33666596
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1229-34
pubmed: 21240030
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Oct;26(10):2820-8
pubmed: 22797000
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jan;27(1):89-100
pubmed: 22362089
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jan;33(1):17-24
pubmed: 28426514
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Feb;28(2):350-60
pubmed: 23689341
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Aug 08;16(3):407-413
pubmed: 28912659
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 May;30(5):1255-64
pubmed: 26439777
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Nov;26(11):2970-4
pubmed: 22190161
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007 Sep;2(3):260-9
pubmed: 19168926