Coupling of CSF and sagittal sinus pressure in adult patients with pseudotumour cerebri.
CSF outflow resistance
CSF pressure
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Intracranial pressure
Pseudotumour cerebri
Sagittal sinus pressure
Journal
Acta neurochirurgica
ISSN: 0942-0940
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 0151000
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
15
05
2019
accepted:
08
10
2019
pubmed:
14
12
2019
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
14
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pseudotumour cerebri syndrome (PTCS including idiopathic intracranial hypertension) is characterised by the symptoms and signs of raised cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFp) in the absence of ventricular dilatation or an intracranial mass lesion. Its aetiology is unknown in the majority of cases but there is much evidence for impaired CSF absorption. Traditionally, sagittal sinus pressure has been considered to be independent of CSF pressure in adults. However, the discovery of stenoses of intracranial venous sinuses and introduction of venous sinus stenting has highlighted the importance of the venous drainage in PTCS. In this study, we have explored the relationship between CSFp and SSp before and during a CSF infusion test and during CSF drainage. Ten patients (9 females:1 male) with PTCS underwent infusion studies in parallel with direct retrograde cerebral venography. Both SSp and CSFp were recorded at a baseline and during CSFp elevation in a course of a CSF infusion test. The drainage of CSF after the CSF infusion was performed in 7 patients. In 5 cases, jugular venous pressure was also measured. CSFp and SSp including their amplitudes correlated significantly and strongly both at baseline (R = 0.96; p = 0.001) and during infusion (R = 0.92; p = 0.0026). During drainage, this correlation was maintained until SSp reached a stable value, whereas CSFp continued to decrease. In this series of ten patients with PTCS, CSFp and SSp were coupled, both at baseline and during infusion. The implications of such coupling for the calculation of CSF outflow resistance are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31832847
doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04095-w
pii: 10.1007/s00701-019-04095-w
pmc: PMC7156361
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1001-1009Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G9439390
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Brain. 1973 Jun;96(2):329-36
pubmed: 4197586
Neurology. 2004 May 25;62(10):1907-8
pubmed: 15159514
Neurosurgery. 2001 Nov;49(5):1214-22; discussion 1222-3
pubmed: 11846915
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2005;30:107-74
pubmed: 16350454
Lancet. 1973 Aug 25;2(7826):418-21
pubmed: 4124896
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):913-927
pubmed: 28960686
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD003434
pubmed: 12137694
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):549-58
pubmed: 8778261
Ann Surg. 1937 Oct;106(4):492-513
pubmed: 17857053
J Neurosurg. 1974 May;40(5):603-8
pubmed: 4544731
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Apr;41(4):345-53
pubmed: 650242
Neurology. 2013 Sep 24;81(13):1159-65
pubmed: 23966248
J Neurosurg. 2003 May;98(5):1045-55
pubmed: 12744365
JRSM Short Rep. 2013 Nov 21;4(12):2042533313507920
pubmed: 24475346
Neurology. 1992 Apr;42(4):851-8
pubmed: 1565241
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:283-5
pubmed: 19388330
Neurology. 1996 Jan;46(1):198-202
pubmed: 8559374
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:145-51
pubmed: 19388307
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Apr;55(4):287-93
pubmed: 1583513
BMC Med. 2013 Oct 11;11:219
pubmed: 24228622
Physiol Meas. 2004 Oct;25(5):R51-76
pubmed: 15535175
Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):228-30
pubmed: 11812561
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:247-51
pubmed: 16463858
Cephalalgia. 2015 Mar;35(3):248-61
pubmed: 24847166
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1977 Feb;40(2):105-19
pubmed: 864474
J Child Neurol. 2011 Jul;26(7):881-4
pubmed: 21498791
Neurology. 1995 Dec;45(12):2224-8
pubmed: 8848197
Surg Neurol. 1981 Mar;15(3):168-74
pubmed: 7221863